User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#75991
Economic commentator (strongly pro-redistribution) and former City trader, getting quite a public profile.

My first response to him was that I loved his stuff about the City, but would get my economics from people like Jonathan Portes instead of him, and haven't looked at it. I shouldn't be snooty really- there's a place for popularisers on the side of the angels, for sure, and I'm no heavyweight myself.

As an economic commentator, it doesn't really matter whether he was the top trader or top admin clerk, but it seems like he's exaggerated about himself a fair bit. He's also portrayed some of the other characters inaccurately under pseudonyms, but I think that's more defensible in that he might reasonably be worried about people in it sueing him.

What do people make of him?
https://www.ft.com/content/7e8b47b3-793 ... d75d057fff
By Youngian
#76003
His cast iron confidence anchored on a pet theory does make me sceptical but I like what he's getting at, who's got all these billions that have been created? As it's not the pot hole repair department.
viewtopic.php?p=65185#p65185
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#76005
Yeah, I think his/your point about the rich accumulating assets is an important one. I don't think wealth taxes work, but taxes on land would. To his credit, Corbyn went there tentatively in 2017, but understandably retreated when the Tories started turning cartwheels ("garden tax").
The Daily Torygraph

And it IS true - fusion power is one of the things[…]

Reform Party

And yet again a national party leader is quoted in[…]

Labour Government 2024 - ?

Here's more from Bush. Not sure what he[…]

Trump 2.0 Lunacy

No Republican is going to side with Musk over Trum[…]