Page 11 of 13

Re: The King

Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2023 11:21 pm
by Oboogie
If anybody in that photo looks uncomfortable, it's the fella being cuddled - he may fear he's being groomed for pegging.

Re: The King

Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2023 1:45 am
by Malcolm Armsteen
Royal twat has got the wrong teeth in.

Re: The King

Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2023 10:41 pm
by davidjay
He always seems a lot happier at Villa Park.

Re: The King

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 10:38 pm
by satnav
Charles put in an excellent performance in parliament while reading out the King's speech. He couldn't have sounded more bored and less interested if he had tried. I think he perfectly reflected te mood of the nation.

Re: The King

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2023 8:02 am
by Youngian
Charlie’s not having a good month after the will trousering revelations and now revealed to have made spiteful racist remarks about Meg and Harry’s off spring. But at least they have the Sun in their corner fighting the good fight against tawdry royal articles.

Re: The King

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2023 11:06 am
by Abernathy
That Omid Scobie geezer’s a bit weird lookin’, innee?

Re: The King

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2023 11:11 am
by Malcolm Armsteen
Arthur Edwards looks weirder...

Re: The King

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2023 11:15 am
by Samanfur
Charlie and the fragrant Kate, allegedly.

Re: The King

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2023 8:25 pm
by kreuzberger
That's quite some stroke played by Chuck. After a feverish morning, no one's now talking about him speculating about the brown kid.

Rather, one has handed one's arse to the other one, gift-wrapped in a decidedly royal shade of Hellenic blue.

What's "mortuus cattus" in Greek?

Re: The King

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2023 9:15 pm
by Andy McDandy
Nemean Lion.

Re: The King

Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 11:39 pm
by satnav
Yesterday social media and the TV news was full of pictures of the royals attending church at Sandringham. Today the royals were busy hunting and shooting at Sandringham but funnily enough there isn't a single picture of the royals hunting and shooting. This just goes to show how much influence the royals have over what images of them appear in the media.

Re: The King

Posted: Wed Dec 27, 2023 7:31 am
by Youngian
A story from five years ago, Harry too pussywhipped to blast grouses on Boxing Day.

Re: The King

Posted: Wed Dec 27, 2023 3:49 pm
by Oboogie
I really want the plural of "grouse" to be "grice", but it isn't.
So I'll just content myself with imagining that the Royal Family (and other English poshos) pronounce it "grice".

Re: The King

Posted: Wed Dec 27, 2023 10:25 pm
by Bones McCoy
Oboogie wrote: Wed Dec 27, 2023 3:49 pm I really want the plural of "grouse" to be "grice", but it isn't.
So I'll just content myself with imagining that the Royal Family (and other English poshos) pronounce it "grice".
"Grice" is how they pronounce the singular.
I like to think it's connected to the equine teeth.

Re: The King

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2023 1:23 am
by Oboogie
Bones McCoy wrote: Wed Dec 27, 2023 10:25 pm
Oboogie wrote: Wed Dec 27, 2023 3:49 pm I really want the plural of "grouse" to be "grice", but it isn't.
So I'll just content myself with imagining that the Royal Family (and other English poshos) pronounce it "grice".
"Grice" is how they pronounce the singular.
I like to think it's connected to the equine teeth.
... and the pegging.

Re: The King

Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2024 11:09 am
by AOB
King's portrait for public buildings unveiled

But when the cost of the portrait scheme was announced last year as £8m, anti-monarchy group Republic called it a "shameful waste of money" and said the government had "lost the plot".
They never had the plot to start with.

When schools were invited to apply, there was an ironic response from National Education Union leader Daniel Kebede, who posted on X, formerly known as Twitter: "Out of glue sticks? Leaky roof? Damp entering through that cracked window frame?

"What your school needs is a picture of King Charles printed on 'high quality' paper."

Re: The King

Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2024 3:44 pm
by Youngian
Low rent hawker on a shopping channel.

Re: The King

Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2024 9:52 pm
by Bones McCoy
kreuzberger wrote: Fri Dec 01, 2023 8:25 pm That's quite some stroke played by Chuck. After a feverish morning, no one's now talking about him speculating about the brown kid.

Rather, one has handed one's arse to the other one, gift-wrapped in a decidedly royal shade of Hellenic blue.

What's "mortuus cattus" in Greek?
νεκρή γάτα

Re: The King

Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2024 5:42 pm
by Oboogie
So Buck House announced today (separately but only a couple of hours apart) that both Charles and Kate are having operations on their nether regions.
Coincidence? Chinny-fucking-reckon!

It's quite obvious to me that the only possible explanation is that they've been indulging in some Regal wurst-hiding with the result that she's had an abortion and Charles is being treated for genital warts.

Poor William's going to need a lot of pegging from Camilla to forgive and forget this one.

Gawd bless 'em!

Re: The King

Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2024 5:58 pm
by Watchman
My take on the Buck Palace reaction “Fuck, if it’s a ginger there’ll be hell to play”