Mailwatch(ed) Forum

The Weeping Angel wrote: ↑Fri Sep 23, 2022 5:29 pm If you want to know how bad the discourse was consider this meme that was being shared.

Apparently she was responsible for the wars in Yugoslavia and the thousands of Icelandic fishermen who she ordered murdered.

And simultaneously, the fucking Times were reporting about double rainbows appearing above Windsor, and various clowns were talking about how their corgis were behaving differently. None of that was planted propaganda. It was real, organic, homegrown stupidity.


Call it a score draw.

Just announced, Brenda's funeral cost the British taxpayer £160M. I advice anyone tempted to complain in public about this to refrain from doing so lest you're thrown in the slammer for half a day, no qurstions asked.

Rosvanian wrote: ↑Thu May 18, 2023 6:11 pm Just announced, Brenda's funeral cost the British taxpayer £160M. I advice anyone tempted to complain in public about this to refrain from doing so lest you're thrown in the slammer for half a day, no qurstions asked.

Makes Thatcher's seem a real bargain.
- With the added bonus of dead Thatcher.

That's nothing Reagen's state funeral cost $400 million dollars.

Reagan's funeral didn't cost the British taxpayer a single penny.

My point was when you compare and contrast with other state funerals, you'll find that others have costed more. Also let's break down the cost of the funeral department by department.

Department for Culture, Media & Sport - £57.42m
Department for Transport - £2.565m
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office - £2.096m
Home Office - £73.68m
Ministry of Defence - £2.890m
Northern Ireland Office - £2.134m
Scottish Government - £18.756m
Welsh Government - £2.202m
Total - £161.743m

So what should those departments have spent their money on instead?

Are you really that stupid? Nobody is arguing that government Departments shouldn't spend money on the business of that Department. The argument is spending £260 million on a funeral and a coronation is £260 million wasted. And what foreign governments waste foreign taxpayers' money on is totally irrelevant.

Your arguments are getting more bizarre by the day.

You do realise that the figures that I quoted are what each department spent on the funeral.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-65636772

So what should those deparments have spent their money on instead?

My point about foreign governments spending money is this. If we were a Republic we'd still very likely spend public money on things like state funeral and other state occasions which other Republics do incidentally. Simply banging on about the cost of the Monarchy is on my view a weak arguement and reminds me of those who used to say let's spend all the money we give to the EU and spend it on whatever the person making that argument wanted it to be spent on instead.

All the Brenda figures are for actual money spent, while Reagan's funeral costs include a national day of mourning which gave federal employees as well as the stock markets a day off.

Reagan's funeral costs include a national day of mourning which gave federal employees as well as the stock markets a day off.

You can’t put a price on a knees up

But amazingly, others can put a “value” on how much the RF brings in through tourism

Watchman wrote: ↑Tue May 23, 2023 7:50 am But amazingly, others can put a “value” on how much the RF brings in through tourism

Always enumerated at the specifically royal "A lot".

Youngian wrote: ↑Tue May 23, 2023 12:32 am

Reagan's funeral costs include a national day of mourning which gave federal employees as well as the stock markets a day off.

You can’t put a price on a knees up

Apparently you can, and it's $400 million