Page 25 of 28

Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2023 11:10 am
by Youngian
The problem with the police these days is that they don’t arrest enough black people

Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2023 4:07 pm
by Bones McCoy
Won't somebody think of the lockdown objectors... During a deadly pandemic.

This and Braverman's work are attempts to anger the football firm demographic.
Wind them up and provide some deniable words of approval.
You have to suspect there's a hope that things will kick off and we can enjoy our very own January 6th.

Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2023 4:37 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Funnily enough, anti-lockdown presenters were overwhelmigly arrested for blatant Covid breaches.


Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2023 4:54 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
The standard lockdown protestor would likely be a fair bit older and less mobile than a BLM protestor.

Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2023 4:56 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Ha ha ha. Credit to Ed Vaizey here.


Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2023 5:01 pm
by Youngian
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Mon Nov 13, 2023 4:56 pm Ha ha ha. Credit to Ed Vaizey here.

Echoes of ‘Soviet Union wasn’t real communism’ from Matt.

Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2023 5:08 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Youngian wrote: Echoes of ‘Soviet Union wasn’t real communism’ from Matt.
Early 80s Labour. If only the Treasury hadn't vetoed our brilliant plan etc.

Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2023 5:16 pm
by Abernathy
Ye gods. Goodwin is an absolutely massive arsehole. And I thought Daniel Hannan was bad.

Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2023 6:25 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
I almost want Cameron to improve Tory fortunes just to shut Goodwin up.

Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2023 8:29 pm
by Bones McCoy
Abernathy wrote: Mon Nov 13, 2023 5:16 pm Ye gods. Goodwin is an absolutely massive arsehole. And I thought Daniel Hannan was bad.
"Dinner Party" extremists are the worst extremists.
This stems form a misplaced confdidence they they'll never face their own emergency measures.
They see themselves directing the mob when the "balloon goes up".
They're rarely right about that.

Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2023 9:56 pm
by Youngian
They do understand who’s voting for them, zealots and fruitcakes like Goodwin and very few else. That’s why they’re on 25 percent.

Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:21 am
by mattomac
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Mon Nov 13, 2023 6:25 pm I almost want Cameron to improve Tory fortunes just to shut Goodwin up.
Wouldn’t Labour’s victory be the same?

Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2023 7:09 am
by Youngian
Tetchy Matt objects to being called far right in response to his claim that the forrins get all the council houses instead of looking after our own. Neither Ford or Portes’s findings on immigration are especially radical and wouldn’t bother a liberal Tory. Neither do they ‘shout down’ Goodwin.


Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2023 12:22 am
by mattomac
Rob ford ripped him a new one so to speak.

Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2023 4:38 am
by Dalem Lake
Well that site where Goodwin got his Somali stats from, a substack called "Pimlico Journal", seems pretty far to the right, referring to ethnic minorities simply as "the blacks" and describing people on disability benefits "lazy cunts".

The style of writing on the site actually reminds me of a fella who blogged under the name "Devil's Kitchen" who spouted the same sweary, liberatarian crap day in and out and actually fancied himself as politician. The BBC actually invited him on once to spout his nonsense and Andrew Neil destroyed him and we never heard from him again.

Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2024 7:20 pm
by Tubby Isaacs

Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2024 7:24 pm
by Andy McDandy
He's remarkable. Every study he does supports his already held views.

Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2024 12:23 pm
by Philip Marlow
Dalem Lake wrote: Mon Dec 11, 2023 4:38 amThe style of writing on the site actually reminds me of a fella who blogged under the name "Devil's Kitchen" who spouted the same sweary, liberatarian crap day in and out and actually fancied himself as politician. The BBC actually invited him on once to spout his nonsense and Andrew Neil destroyed him and we never heard from him again.
Now there’s a blast from the past, although honestly the whole ‘blogosphere’ scene rather feels like that these days.

My first encounter with the Devil’s Kitchen was a post on Jean Charles de Menezes which argued that because he might have overstayed his visa he only had himself to blame for getting shot. From this I concluded that the author was likely a massive prick. Having just looked up that Brillo interview I see that I was right.

Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2024 1:33 pm
by Youngian
Andy McDandy wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 7:24 pm He's remarkable. Every study he does supports his already held views.
‘Cultural security’ is a concept discussed by no one.

Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2024 1:55 pm
by Bones McCoy
Andy McDandy wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 7:24 pm He's remarkable. Every study he does supports his already held views.
I asked all my followers their views.
By complete coincidence their views were the ones I'd given them.