Mailwatch(ed) Forum

Gives a whole new meaning to the "Sidebar of Shame"

Nicked from the BBC:

The Daily Mail leads on the political fall-out from his remarks.

"Tories turn on Whitty" is its headline - with Mr Johnson facing calls to "rein in alarmist government scientists". One MP, the paper says, has warned Britain is being turned into a "public health socialist state".

See comments made elsewhere on Whitty's qualifications to talk on this matter.

To paraphrase Creepy Gove: "We've had enough of politicians".

This afternoon the Fail is running with what's really important:

Where are the Chitty Chitty Bang Bang cast now?

As it anyone actually gives a fuck.

Half of them are dead, I'd have thought.

Andy McDandy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 22, 2021 7:21 pm Half of them are dead, I'd have thought.

Well, Sally-Ann Howes certainly is now:

https://variety.com/2021/film/news/sall ... 235142023/

Ho ho.

Will the Mail take this defeat would good grace? ‘You win some, lose some, team. So let’s lay off Harry and Meg in future.’ Probably not.

It’s a double whammy, has the gammon choking on their cornflakes and makes the Mail pissed off.

Am I missing something here, because the actual front page was nothing like that?

https://www.joe.co.uk/news/the-mail-on- ... -it-308441##

The Mail on Sunday has published its court-ordered apology to Meghan Markle on the quietest new day of the year.

Miniscule font on the front page of the paper directs readers to Page 3 to read their full apology for publishing extracts of a letter sent by Meghan to her estranged father.

Mail Online was also ordered to publish an apology on their home page, and it's there, just buried beneath several scrolls worth of other dross.

Hold the front page!

17 year-old looks different now than when he was five.

'Strongest boy in the world' who achieved a world record for the most 90-degree push-ups as a toddler is unrecognisable as he turns 17


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/arti ... hotos.html

"Whitehall Blob vows: we'll work from home for ever"

[Steve Barclay] also ordered them to provide figures on the number of staff who have returned to Whitehall by the end of next week, so he can report back to the Prime Minister.

Mr Barclay said: 'It is important that Government departments lead the way in getting people back to the office, helping our economy get back up to full speed.

So what happened to those Net Zero targets, or is "every desk should be filled" more important? Or is Whitehall really filled with slackers who have to be kept under constant observation?

It could be that they're erroneously judging the entire civil service on the actions of the lazy piss-heads in No 10.

Boiler wrote: ↑Sun Jan 23, 2022 11:01 am "Whitehall Blob vows: we'll work from home for ever"

[Steve Barclay] also ordered them to provide figures on the number of staff who have returned to Whitehall by the end of next week, so he can report back to the Prime Minister.

Mr Barclay said: 'It is important that Government departments lead the way in getting people back to the office, helping our economy get back up to full speed.

So what happened to those Net Zero targets, or is "every desk should be filled" more important? Or is Whitehall really filled with slackers who have to be kept under constant observation?

The comments are enlightening.
A bunch of retired fuds who get priapatic at the thought of job dismissals.

Do like Reagan, sack the lot.

OK Grandpa, who's going to deliver your pension?

Why do I feel when I see “Whitehall blob” that they are referring to Johnson.

After what we saw with the Parties I think working from home might be a better idea.

Elsewhere on Mail online:

Controversial Highway Code overhaul that tells cyclists to pedal in the middle of the road takes effect in DAYS amid warning new rules will lead to spike in road rage incidents


That one again. I wonder how many motorists ever pick up a copy of The Highway Code after they've passed their driving test? Strangely, I've always given way to pedestrians waiting to cross the road at junctions...

Boiler wrote: ↑Sun Jan 23, 2022 2:22 pm Elsewhere on Mail online:

Controversial Highway Code overhaul that tells cyclists to pedal in the middle of the road takes effect in DAYS amid warning new rules will lead to spike in road rage incidents


Screenshot 2022-01-23 at 14-21-23 Campaigners hit out at Highway Code overhaul set to start next week.png


That one again. I wonder how many motorists ever pick up a copy of The Highway Code after they've passed their driving test? Strangely, I've always given way to pedestrians waiting to cross the road at junctions...

The Times were at this too.

It's actually quite dangerous. The Highway Code is a serious thing, and many people are fuckwitted enough on the roads and don't need any more windmills to point their deathly sense of futility at. Lying - not joking, not playing - lying about road rules and divide and rule vis road users is actually pretty fucking scummy.

I find it a bit distasteful, that "warning new rules will lead to spike in road rage incidents" bit.

If you set off flares in an Alpine valley, you risk causing an avalanche. That's direct cause and effect. New rules = greater incidence of road rage is not.

It's basically pre-emptively excusing people who assault others. Well, what did you expect? These new rules are just so frustrating, I had to punch a cyclist out. It's my reaction to everything. Every time a TV programme overruns or gets cancelled I put my boot through the TV and slap the nearest family member. I can't help it, it's in my nature.

New rules will not lead to a spike in assaults. Dickheads getting frustrated and losing their tempers will.

Somebody blew their horn at me t'other day because I stopped to let a pedestrian across a junction...

I see the old Dacre misogyny is back.



(Pure narrativium; the king is a good man, he's just badly advised/he's under the spell of some witch)