Page 7 of 11

Re: Mail Headlines

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2023 9:47 am
by Abernathy
"Sinister forces" my arse. She's not going to the Lords because she's a dimwitted fascistic fuckwit.

Re: Mail Headlines

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2023 10:34 am
by Malcolm Armsteen
Abernathy wrote: Tue Jun 13, 2023 9:47 am "Sinister forces" my arse. She's not going to the Lords because she's a dimwitted fascistic fuckwit.
Since when has that been cause for disqualification?

Re: Mail Headlines

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2023 10:38 am
by Abernathy
Fair point. Think of Digby Pudding Jones.

Re: Mail Headlines

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2023 11:14 am
by Yug
And Lord Frost

Re: Mail Headlines

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2023 12:07 pm
by Dalem Lake
And Claire Fox

Re: Mail Headlines

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2023 12:09 pm
by Abernathy
And Kate Hoey.

OK, we can stop now.

Re: Mail Headlines

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2023 3:55 pm
by MisterMuncher
I'd imagine there's fun to be had if they're saying Humble Background+Cabinet Post= Lordship when it comes time for Ladies Rayner and Phillips on that basis

Re: Mail Headlines

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2023 4:31 pm
by Watchman
On a more sombre note, and not wishing to politicise this; the Mail is not allowing any comments by readers in respect of the tragedy in Nottingham, however if it had been in "Lawless London" the mayor would be considered fair game

Re: Mail Headlines

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2023 10:32 pm
by Lardboy
As always, the right wing ghouls were out in force about Nottingham. All speculating over the skin colour of the perpetrator.

In general, they (and their respective horses) were told exactly where to go.

Much love to my city tonight.

Re: Mail Headlines

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2023 10:50 pm
by Oboogie
GBeebies have stated as a #FACT that the perpetrator is an "illegal asylum seeker from West Africa". "He has dreadlocks" They have sources you know and just because they're anonymous doesn't mean they are lying or don't exist.
At all!
You won't hear that on the anti-British BBC!

Re: Mail Headlines

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2023 12:34 pm
by Yug
Nannying GP surgeries text patients urging them to take care in the heat: Alerts inform public 'it's hot' and that they should 'drink plenty of water' and 'stay out of the sun'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/arti ... -heat.html
Dishing out sound advice on avoiding heat-related illnesses is nannying :roll:

...Officials said the alerts were in response to many younger patients presenting at hospitals with issues such as heatstroke, asthma and allergies, exacerbated by the heatwave.

But the decision was branded 'nannying' and a waste of valuable resources when many patients struggle to get GP appointments.

Greg Smith, Tory MP for Buckingham, said: 'My constituents want to be able to see a GP quickly when they need one, to get rapid care if they need a hospital referral or treatment and to know the best new medical technology and drugs are being procured.

'What they don't want, don't need and will be totally bemused by is valuable resources – their taxes – being wasted on nannying text messages that state the bloody obvious.'...
Well, Greg Smith, 1) if GP appointments are so difficult to obtain then advice on how to not need an appointment is probably a Good Thing. 2) if people are turning up at A&E with heat-related ailments then perhaps the advice isn't quite so "bloody obvious" as you seem to think it is. 3) maybe if your Party hadn't spent the last 13 years wasting taxpayers' money GP appointments might have been a little easier to come by.

Once again, the Fail reveals what cunts they and their Tory friends are.

Re: Mail Headlines

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2023 1:36 pm
by Killer Whale
Apart from anything, blanket-bombing your contacts list with a simple text message costs next to nothing in terms of time and network fees. It's not like they're getting everyone togther to stuff envelopes and stick stamps on them.

Re: Mail Headlines

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2023 2:47 pm
by Spoonman
In my experience, the same twats that are first to pipe up about "nannying" or some "nanny state" bollocks are usually the first to complain about the authorities not warning them about something in the same vein.

Re: Mail Headlines

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2023 7:44 pm
by davidjay
Killer Whale wrote: Fri Jun 16, 2023 1:36 pm Apart from anything, blanket-bombing your contacts list with a simple text message costs next to nothing in terms of time and network fees. It's not like they're getting everyone togther to stuff envelopes and stick stamps on them.
Mail readers very likely still think each text is sent out individually.

Re: Mail Headlines

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2023 10:10 pm
by Andy McDandy
Basically, they want the best, but for free.

Re: Mail Headlines

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2023 11:24 pm
by Bones McCoy
Andy McDandy wrote: Fri Jun 16, 2023 10:10 pm Basically, they want the best, but for free.
And only for them, not everybody else.

Re: Mail Headlines

Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2023 10:45 am
by Watchman
Why do I get suspicious when people write their account as if they’d had a PR company advising them


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... field.html

Re: Mail Headlines

Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2023 11:21 am
by Andy McDandy
Reading between the lines, he made several inappropriate comments and thought he was being funny.

And if he's such an amazing teacher who has written all these textbooks, what's he doing supply teaching for?

Re: Mail Headlines

Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2023 11:32 am
by Malcolm Armsteen
This is utter bollocks.
Julie, who has taught in primary schools for 35 years, points out, times have changed. 'You can't say breastfeeding any more, you have to say chest feeding,' she says. Roy raises an eyebrow. 'Boys can apparently chest feed,' he says.

'You can't say vaginal birth. It's frontal birth,' Julie, 56, continues. 'And there are so many different identities — about 62 or 63 different genders.
I smell an agenda...

Re: Mail Headlines

Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2023 12:31 pm
by Watchman
After previously being graded by Ofsted as 'outstanding' or 'good to outstanding' in 27 inspections,