Page 4 of 4

Re: Sarah Vine talks shit

Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2023 3:59 pm
by Andy McDandy
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/arti ... ernet.html

Fuck off Sarah Vine, it wasn't the interwebs that killed Brianna Ghey, so stop acting like her murder just proves you were right all along. Remember Sophie Lancaster, and one of your colleagues and his fictional Geordie friend? "Give us a stick and I'll kill it"? Lucy Meadows ring any bells?

Fucking cunt, probably loving her ex's pet project, L'il Kimmy B, determined to make trans kids acceptable mandated targets for school bullies by government orders.

Re: Sarah Vine talks shit

Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2023 9:06 pm
by davidjay
Her and the BTLs hate the internet, yet what medium are they using to spread their poison? As ever it's not me, it's the others.

Re: Sarah Vine talks shit

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2024 6:43 pm
by Youngian
Date for the diary
Daily Mail launches new weekly talk show ‘The Reaction.
Recorded in the Daily Mail’s new state-of-the-art studios in its West London offices, the talk show will premiere at 5pm on Wednesday 10 January 2024. It will be broadcast at the same time every week on the Daily Mail’s YouTube channel.

Vine said: “For me, this show is all about giving the viewer the low-down on all the stories that really matter – but also about offering lively, intelligent debate.

“We will probe, provoke and hopefully provide food for thought for viewers seeking to make sense of the madness of the modern world.” https://www.newsworks.org.uk/news-and-o ... -reaction/

Re: Sarah Vine talks shit

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2024 6:47 pm
by Andy McDandy
A couple of columnists interview several talking heads over whether they strongly agree with the Mail's line on the big issues, or do they vehemently agree with them.

Nope, never been done before.

Re: Sarah Vine talks shit

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2024 6:51 pm
by Abernathy
There are at least two existing Weirdo-Gammon TV channels already turning out that sort of pish, are there not ?

Re: Sarah Vine talks shit

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2024 7:59 pm
by Spoonman
That has all the hallmarks of The S*n's online radio show with John Gaunt a few years ago that barely lasted for a few weeks.

The problem (at least on this side of the Atlantic) is with hosting a politically partisan talk show is that unless you actually get people across the political spectrum to participate in said shows, all you're doing is creating an echo chamber that only attracts a very limited audience, and with that an audience that isn't a big target for most advertisers. Exhibit A: KGBN & Exhibit B: Talk TV. Exhibit C in Talk Radio has had some success better than its TV counterparts, but it's still hit a glass ceiling for the time being at least.

Re: Sarah Vine talks shit

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2024 8:53 pm
by Abernathy
Spoonman wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 7:59 pm

The problem (at least on this side of the Atlantic) is with hosting a politically partisan talk show is that unless you actually get people across the political spectrum to participate in said shows, all you're doing is creating an echo chamber that only attracts a very limited audience, and with that an audience that isn't a big target for most advertisers. Exhibit A: KGBN & Exhibit B: Talk TV. Exhibit C in Talk Radio has had some success better than its TV counterparts, but it's still hit a glass ceiling for the time being at least.
I think James O’Brien on LBC had successfully cracked this problem, despite the criticisms still lobbed at him by the Gammon. During the Brexit interregnum , between the referendum result and actually departing the EU, he regularly used to get total fuckwits phoning in whose “arguments” he would proceed absolutely to demolish. Now, (alas), he doesn’t get so many wankers ringing in, though he does maintain “Idiot’s Corner” for the fuckwit text messages he still gets.

Re: Sarah Vine talks shit

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2024 10:14 pm
by Bones McCoy
Spoonman wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 7:59 pm That has all the hallmarks of The S*n's online radio show with John Gaunt a few years ago that barely lasted for a few weeks.

The problem (at least on this side of the Atlantic) is with hosting a politically partisan talk show is that unless you actually get people across the political spectrum to participate in said shows, all you're doing is creating an echo chamber that only attracts a very limited audience, and with that an audience that isn't a big target for most advertisers. Exhibit A: KGBN & Exhibit B: Talk TV. Exhibit C in Talk Radio has had some success better than its TV counterparts, but it's still hit a glass ceiling for the time being at least.
It's not all bad news though.

You get to whine incessantly about being cancelled.
After Unilever, AstraZeneca and Shell won't obediently fill your advertising slots.

Re: Sarah Vine talks shit

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2024 10:22 pm
by kreuzberger
Bones McCoy wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 10:14 pm
Spoonman wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 7:59 pm That has all the hallmarks of The S*n's online radio show with John Gaunt a few years ago that barely lasted for a few weeks.

The problem (at least on this side of the Atlantic) is with hosting a politically partisan talk show is that unless you actually get people across the political spectrum to participate in said shows, all you're doing is creating an echo chamber that only attracts a very limited audience, and with that an audience that isn't a big target for most advertisers. Exhibit A: KGBN & Exhibit B: Talk TV. Exhibit C in Talk Radio has had some success better than its TV counterparts, but it's still hit a glass ceiling for the time being at least.
It's not all bad news though.

You get to whine incessantly about being cancelled.
After Unilever, AstraZeneca and Shell won't obediently fill your advertising slots.
The broadcast media advertising revenue is in the toilet - see Channel 4 - and the pubes on the rim are sure to be pissed off. Oh well...

Re: Sarah Vine talks shit

Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2024 1:20 am
by Bones McCoy
Andy McDandy wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 6:47 pm A couple of columnists interview several talking heads over whether they strongly agree with the Mail's line on the big issues, or do they vehemently agree with them.

Nope, never been done before.
Cannon and Ball have let themselves go.