Re: The Sun
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2023 2:33 pm
Killer Whale wrote: ↑Thu Jul 13, 2023 2:25 pm Sounds delightful.Critics of WFH overlook the health benefits for sex workers.
Killer Whale wrote: ↑Thu Jul 13, 2023 2:25 pm Sounds delightful.Critics of WFH overlook the health benefits for sex workers.
Killer Whale wrote: ↑Thu Jul 13, 2023 2:25 pm Sounds delightful.I read that during lockdown a number (many) of people took to using OF to try to make enough to buy food...
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: ↑Thu Jul 13, 2023 2:42 pm Neil Wallis (ex-editor of the Sun) being interviewed on Sky News.Isn't that the berk who used to like to be known as "Wolf Man" but according to Fenton, had a rather less polite nickname in the office?
Rupert Murdoch’s News UK has offered tens of thousands of pounds to the parents who made allegations about Huw Edwards, in return for a television interview, according to sources at the media company.
Bones McCoy wrote: ↑Thu Jul 13, 2023 2:45 pmBefore making my excuses and left as Neil Wallis would say. It’s getting desperate if they’re having to wheel out him, McKenzie and Rod Liddle to provide balance.Youngian wrote: ↑Thu Jul 13, 2023 2:23 pm You can DM on Only Fans, there’s also a tips button. If it gets pressed enough, the site owner will reveal more tits, fanny or cock etc.It's tradition to close with "An anoymous source informed me ...."
Youngian wrote: ↑Thu Jul 13, 2023 2:33 pmCritics of OnlyFans in the British press despise the idea of anyone selling their body when they don't get a cut.Killer Whale wrote: ↑Thu Jul 13, 2023 2:25 pm Sounds delightful.Critics of WFH overlook the health benefits for sex workers.
Rupert Murdoch’s News UK has offered tens of thousands of pounds to the parents who made allegations about Huw Edwards, in return for a television interview, according to sources at the media company.
The Guardian understands that an interview with the couple has been recorded and is being edited for broadcast on TalkTV, the sister station of the Sun. Sources said the parents have been offered a significant sum for this.
Well, that's what the parents told us. See? We got it all on tape.
satnav wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 8:28 pm I thought 'The Sun' were trying to justify their story on the grounds that the young person involved was vulnerable, surely if this young person is vulnerable his parents appearing on national TV is going to publicly identify who he is. How on earth can TalkTV justify this?The concerned parents are outing their own son, his name will be viral on Twitter shortly after broadcast.
It might yet turn out that Edwards has engaged in abusive, intimidatory, or even illegal behaviour. None of that takes away from the story so far - that the Sun knowingly published uncorroborated, unfounded allegations against the man accusing him of illegal sexual activity with a child. Others will write about the legal side of case, the subject of journalistic ethics and standards, privacy issues, and the role of social media in forcing his name into the press. But for me, what has been disturbing but clarifying about the affair is what it tells us about the state of sexual toleration in Britain, and how the nation's deep culture of homophobia, long thought to be on the way out, the preserve of a few prudes and bigots, still lies beneath a thin crust of acceptance, just waiting to seep out. Edwards' treatment has been worse than it might have been, and the reason for that is a widespread homophobic anxiety about closeted men.
Philip Marlow wrote: ↑Sat Jul 15, 2023 3:55 pm Hugh Lemmey - a very good writer whose two part series on how Private Eye has chosen to write about gay (and latterly trans) people down the years is well worth reading - weighs in.There's a mean "telling it how it is" streak to Private Eye on some issues. Most obviously with architecture, but I suppose that's relatively harmless.