:sunglasses: 100 %
User avatar
By Dalem Lake
#33705
Oboogie wrote:Hunt's probably assuming Truss'll be gone very soon...and who better than the Chancellor to be anointed as her successor?
Alternatively, he may be a hypocritical turncoat - he is a Tory after-all.
Thing is though, the last three successors came from the Home and Foreign offices. We could have Braverman or Cleverley as PM :!:
By Oboogie
#33707
Dalem Lake wrote: Sat Oct 15, 2022 12:22 am
Oboogie wrote:Hunt's probably assuming Truss'll be gone very soon...and who better than the Chancellor to be anointed as her successor?
Alternatively, he may be a hypocritical turncoat - he is a Tory after-all.
Thing is though, the last three successors came from the Home and Foreign offices. We could have Braverman or Cleverley as PM :!:
Only if a majority of Tory MPs believe they would be popular with the electorate.
By mattomac
#33719
Oboogie wrote: Sat Oct 15, 2022 12:41 am
Dalem Lake wrote: Sat Oct 15, 2022 12:22 am
Oboogie wrote:Hunt's probably assuming Truss'll be gone very soon...and who better than the Chancellor to be anointed as her successor?
Alternatively, he may be a hypocritical turncoat - he is a Tory after-all.
Thing is though, the last three successors came from the Home and Foreign offices. We could have Braverman or Cleverley as PM :!:
Only if a majority of Tory MPs believe they would be popular with the electorate.
No one is quite sure what they believe.

Sue-Ellen does have that end of show quality about her, effectively Quest or Really have bought the rights after BBC had dumped it to iPlayer in its last series of contract.
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#33744
satnav wrote: Sat Oct 15, 2022 8:17 pm I wonder if Jeremy Hunt was the first person she offered the job to or did other candidates give her the brush off? Surely appointing somebody like Rees-Mogg would have kept the right wing nutjobs in the party happy.
By Bones McCoy
#33745
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: Sat Oct 15, 2022 9:03 pm
satnav wrote: Sat Oct 15, 2022 8:17 pm I wonder if Jeremy Hunt was the first person she offered the job to or did other candidates give her the brush off? Surely appointing somebody like Rees-Mogg would have kept the right wing nutjobs in the party happy.
As Miriam might say, Javid gave the Lettow-Vorbeck response.
Later, when Hitler offered him the ambassadorship to the Court of St James's in 1935, he "declined with frigid hauteur"; the suggestion for the nomination as ambassador to the Court of St James had come from retired Colonel Richard Meinertzhagen during a visit to Berlin.

During the 1960s, Charles Miller asked the nephew of a Schutztruppe officer, "I understand that von Lettow told Hitler to go fuck himself." The nephew responded, "That's right, except that I don't think he put it that politely."
Arrowhead liked this
By Youngian
#33758
So Hunt’s now the defacto PM. Liz will become like that invisible Liverpool Council Leader (Hamilton?) who was supposedly deputy leader Hatton’s boss.
Hunt’s arrival will show whether the public are having a temporary sulk with the Tories or if they are toast (if polling doesn’t move much in their favour).
By Bones McCoy
#33794
satnav wrote: Sun Oct 16, 2022 2:56 pm Honest, straight talking Jeremy Hunt has spent much of the last 24 hours talking about the need for more efficiency savings in government departments. Why can't he just call a spade a spade and admit that the government will be making lots of redundancies and decimating services?
That would contradict the basis of the Tories biggest lie. (It's a heavily contested title).
The idea that if you pay less / provide less funding for a service it will "become more efficient".

"Become more efficient" is a direct lift from Truss' last press conference.

My own experience with public services in higher education and defence were of reduced funding leading to foolish short term economies that made everything run far less efficiently.

A classic example was transferring hardware maintenance contracts to cheaper providers.
Then discovering that they didn't have engineers with the necessary security clearance to visit the site and perform maintenance.
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#33809
Becoming more efficient is easier to swallow - who wouldn't want a bit more efficiency? Sounds better than "putting your kids out of work".

When I was with Warwickshire Libraries, we had lots of efficiency savings. One plan was to lease mobile libraries from a company and to outsource their repairs/MOTs etc to a garage in Lincolnshire, because this meant a lower annual spend than owning and maintaining the vehicles ourselves. Thankfully we were able to argue that a) £30,000 (or whatever) as a lump sum was better than £6,000 every year for 10 years, and b) that we had an entire motor pool of apprentices who would jump at the chance to fix the vans as part of their jobs. Sanity prevailed, but it didn't always.
User avatar
By Watchman
#33813
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: Sat Oct 15, 2022 4:14 pm Very childish, hard not to laugh...

I’m not entirely convinced all of them are “accidental”
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 7
long long title how many chars? lets see 123 ok more? yes 60

We have created lots of YouTube videos just so you can achieve [...]

Another post test yes yes yes or no, maybe ni? :-/

The best flat phpBB theme around. Period. Fine craftmanship and [...]

Do you need a super MOD? Well here it is. chew on this

All you need is right here. Content tag, SEO, listing, Pizza and spaghetti [...]

Lasagna on me this time ok? I got plenty of cash

this should be fantastic. but what about links,images, bbcodes etc etc? [...]