User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#100198
Cameron's Tories never received any dodgy donations either. He didn't for instance promise no top down reorganization of the NHS, take loads of private health donations, and do the biggest reorganization for 60 years.
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#100275
It's occured to me that if the scandals that had occured under Starmer occured under Cameron how many would have resulted in resignations?
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#100279
Rushanara Ali wouldn't have gone- I thought actually she had a defence that she tried to sell the house, but the market deteriorated, so she let it out again, at market rate having (apparently) let it out a long way below that for years. Labour ministers always get pushed much harder to resign. Mandelson of all people had a raw deal when he resigned the second time under Blair.
By mattomac
#100317
Doubt Rayner would to be honest.

Haigh probably wouldn’t have under Johnson to Sunak.
By davidjay
#100329
The Weeping Angel wrote: Tue Nov 18, 2025 8:43 am It's occured to me that if the scandals that had occured under Starmer occured under Cameron how many would have resulted in resignations?
Maybe all of them. From May onwards no chance. Johnson would probably have promoted them.
mattomac liked this
User avatar
By Boiler
#100557
The Weeping Angel wrote: Fri Nov 21, 2025 10:06 pm Whilst Starmer has undoubtedly made mistakes in his office it should be remembered he was right about Covid.
And do we all remember the squawking by Sunak about how Labour would have locked us down forever or something?
By Youngian
#100562
Sunak has some questions to answer with his eating out meal subsidy, didn't that spread infection? As if they'd be any other consequence.
mattomac liked this
User avatar
By Abernathy
#100726
Thinking about Starmer's apparently piss-poor personal opinion poll ratings - the most unpopular PM since Pitt the Younger, or something - it seems highly likely to me that most - if not all - of the people that respond to these polls take their cue from the overwhelmingly hostile (hostile to Labour, that is) media environment , and just go along with the generalised "Starmer is shit" vibe that is actually created by and maintained by The Daily Mail, the Express, Telegraph, Times, Sun, GB News ,Twitter/X, and so on and so on.

Objectively, Starmer just isn't that bad. He's not great, and doesn't make the pulse race, I will grant you, but as PM, I think he is doing a bloody good job as PM in one of the toughest set of circumstances anybody has ever faced. Labour PMs always face media hostility, it's true. But we shouldn't allow this to run away with us.
By Youngian
#100730
Gordon Brown faced similar absurd disproportionate hostility on a personal as well as on a political level even before he called a bigoted old woman a bigoted old woman.
Stewart Lee once asked his audiences if they'd stopped and thought that Boris Johnson was an actual real mayor not a comedy mascot one while Ken Livingstone does the real work in a crate.
Perhaps that's how you win and hold power faced with the 21st century's increasingly infantilised electorates; put up Coco the Clown for leader while Starmer and Brown do the real work in hiding.
  • 1
  • 161
  • 162
  • 163
  • 164
  • 165

Worst thing about this is it was quite in the publ[…]

Labour Government 2024 - ?

Well there is a whole library on how Labour's[…]

The Greens

A lot of the Japan debt mentioned by Zack is inter[…]

The BBC

I'm trying to remember the last time the BB[…]