User avatar
By Boiler
#103534
soulboy wrote: Tue Jan 13, 2026 2:48 pm Are podcasts still considered an audio medium? The big bucks are now on YouTube so many are "video-first" formats, with the occasional bone thrown to listeners with a description of what the viewers can see.

Here is a prime example of the BBC.
Ed Gamble hosts the official visualised podcast for the ultimate game of trust and treachery.
Isn't that just a TV show?
Well, quite; one YT channel I follow does these 'visualised' podcasts which is a pity as I would listen to them in the car if they were audio-only...

Meanwhile, the BBC has changed the title of the article I linked to earlier and dropped the "hacking" from it.
User avatar
By Killer Whale
#103541
It's just people chatting, but with fucking enormous microphones in front of their faces. Because it's a podcast.
By Youngian
#103544
Radio stations now stick cameras in studios, they're still radio shows not Later with Jools or the Graham Norton show.
User avatar
By Samanfur
#103545
They've been doing it for years. I remember Victoria Derbyshire doing it in the early 2010s.
By Youngian
#103548
Samanfur wrote: Tue Jan 13, 2026 5:07 pm They've been doing it for years. I remember Victoria Derbyshire doing it in the early 2010s.
That was a TV studio show with audio broadcast on the radio. There are podcasts that make an effort with some sofas and guests knocking back some bevvies but its mainly heads behind mics in a studio.
User avatar
By Boiler
#103549
Killer Whale wrote: Tue Jan 13, 2026 4:27 pm It's just people chatting, but with fucking enormous microphones in front of their faces. Because it's a podcast.
Ah yes: Reassuringly Large Microphones, the trademark of so many podcasts.

Unless your RLM says Neumann or AKG on it, you can fuck off.
User avatar
By kreuzberger
#103642
There still seems to be quite some outrage over the BBC's coverage of what is happening in Iran, "leaving it all" to the very tittersome, Omid Djalli. Yes, he is good and he might be well-informed. But, that is commentary and is not news.

The BBC were clearly struggling to verify the snippets of information which they were receiving and only a fool would blame them one bit for not running with what might have been utter nonsense.

Where the BBC have failed their audience, their BBC Persian team and the wonderful Lyce Dousyeeeria, is that they just kept schtumm. A brief explanation would have changed everything.
User avatar
By Boiler
#103684
Amol Rajan to leave Radio 4's Today programme

Jolly good. Don't let the doors at BH hit your arse etc. etc.

However, he continued: "Twenty years after I first flirted with the idea, I'm extremely excited to jump into the Great Digital Narnia of the Creator Economy, and build my own company. I'll still do Britain's oldest TV quiz and most exciting podcast.
User avatar
By Killer Whale
#103685
I quite like him. Mrs Whale can't stand him, and particularly his ubiquity. Mind you, she's a notoriously poor judge of radio presenters - she doesn't like the lovely Katie Razzall, for example. Incomprehensible.
Oboogie liked this
User avatar
By Abernathy
#103696
Well , how could you not love a woman named after a scud mag ?
  • 1
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
Kemi Badenoch

No doubt somebody will have scanned Jenprick&rsquo[…]

The BBC

Well , how could you not love a woman named after […]

Meanwhile in Scotland

Me and Kreuz have met so I can verify we are[…]

Labour Government 2024 - ?

Didn't a certain PM - under the influence o[…]