Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Sun Jan 25, 2026 1:25 pm
I already feel sorry for the Labour candidate. It'll likely be someone with a solid local record, but they'll just get called "Starmer's poodle" whatever they've done locally.
And if the candidate were to be Burnham, you can bet your bollocks that the whole by-election campaign would be dominated by the question of Burnham’s leadership ambitions - whether Burnham wanted it to be or not.
I do find it fairly galling that the news coverage of this has been focused exclusively on a “Burnham’s after Starmer’s job” narrative. We sometimes forget the costs that political parties (and local authorities) have to meet when a by-election for a post like Greater Manchester mayor has to be held - for Manchester it’s estimated to be north of 5 million quid - and the Labour Party’s governing body is obliged to consider the cost of indulging an incumbent Metro Mayor leaving his post two years early to try to contest a parliamentary by-election. It’s literally the entire reason that the rule requiring incumbent mayors to obtain permission from the NEC exists.
Granted, Burnham has done himself no favours by declaring publicly that he really
is after Keir Starmer’s job, but that really isn’t the whole story. The NEC vote was pretty emphatic with 8 to 1 NEC members voting to deny Burnham’s request, and that really ought to be the end of it. But it won’t be. And that is galling.
In the meantime, arseholes like Karl Turner can just fuck right off.
"The opportunity to serve our country: that is all we ask.” John Smith, May 11, 1994.