[Tubby Isaacs]

Starmer in fight to reassert control over Labour party after McSweeney exit
Allies hope aide’s departure can quell anger over Mandelson scandal but others say it leaves PM dangerously exposed

"We weren't going to go after the Prime Minister, but were too frightened of Morgan McSweeney", said nobody ever. "Now that the guy we all hated has left, we hate Starmer even more".

[Boiler]

Which just about sums things up now.

No doubt Fuckwit Fenton will be crowing about the "Curse of Zelo Street" from his hiding place in Portugal.

[Abernathy]

I’m trying hard to stand fast against the relentless media narrative that Starmer has to go, and it’s not a question of whether, just when, Keir Starmer will be leaving number ten. I don’t want him to go, because I genuinely think he is the best possible Prime Minister the UK could have right now. I also think him being forced out now would be grotesquely unfair. He has never even met Jeffrey Epstein, was not in parliament when Mandelson was leaking information to Epstein, and did not, and could not, have known of it until it was exposed by the US state department’s latest release of the Epstein files. Had it not been, the appointment of Mandelson as ambassador to the USA would quite possibly still be being regarded as a good one at the time.

That said, it could be that Starmer’s jacket is on a shoogly peg, as we say in Paisley. At the very least, the Labour Party should be looking at some succession planning - widely recognised as good business practice. Keir Starmer now has a target painted on his back. If he isn’t brought down now, then this has perhaps shown that it is possible for him to be defenestrated. Unless he very swiftly acquires some down and dirty political skills - the sort of thing he was perhaps hitherto reliant entirely on McSweeney for - he may not be able to fight the cunts in his own party off indefinitely.

[Youngian]

Well said, its not as if German tanks are on the outskirts of Moscow.
Why the heck should Keir resign in a period of panic with the media clucking away like distressed chickens? A government only gets one shot at changing leader and they need to go the country before the honeymoon period ends. Who the hell wants a GE this year?

[Malcolm Armsteen]

I swear the Beth Rigby was actually salivating on Sky...

[Boiler]

I switched on the radio just now; Robinson and Badenoch.

Turned it off again. Vile, despicable creatures, the pair of them.

[Boiler]

Who the hell wants a GE this year?

The media. Chaos justifies their existence.

[Youngian]

I swear the Beth Rigby was actually salivating on Sky...

Sometimes listen to Rigby's podcast as regular contributor Harriet Harman draws on a wealth of experience to put some perspective on the week's events. Sounds like last week she's been hanging out too much with Beth judging by her melodramatic reaponse to the Mandelson debacle. Its taken a showbiz correspondent Marina Hyde to show some perspective; Mandelson is not even the biggest scandal in the Epstein scandal (fucking terrible though Mandelson's schmoozing has been)
And Starmer has never even met the bloke.

[mattomac]

As someone said it’s culpable to an average Tuesday in the Johnson years.

[Tubby Isaacs]

Andy McDonald has come up with “Starmer will have to resign if he doesn’t persuade Labour MPs he’s taking responsibility”. What does this actually mean?

I suggest it means “I want him to go and me and my mates will have a good crack at that”.

[Tubby Isaacs]

If Starmer’s position is untenable because he can’t control his party, where does that leave Badenoch? How many has she lost to Reform?
Perhaps we could accept that politics is more febrile generally, and that putting “the next person” in charge doesn’t change it.