Malcolm Armsteen wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2026 7:40 pm Autocutie on Sky News almost wetting herself over Trump saying Starmer 'isn't Churchill'. Palpable glee.Of course Starmer isn't Churchill, we don't need a Churchill, we're not at war.
Oboogie wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2026 9:29 pmWon't happen 'cos he's diplomatic, but I'd love to see Starmer reply along the lines of "Well I'm not exactly dealing with FDR or JFK myself".Malcolm Armsteen wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2026 7:40 pm Autocutie on Sky News almost wetting herself over Trump saying Starmer 'isn't Churchill'. Palpable glee.Of course Starmer isn't Churchill, we don't need a Churchill, we're not at war.
"The Weeping Angel wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2026 7:46 pmOnly on the second question.
Public opinion seems to be on Starmer's side.
Spoonman wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2026 10:32 pmHe isn't even dealing with Nixon!Oboogie wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2026 9:29 pmWon't happen 'cos he's diplomatic, but I'd love to see Starmer reply along the lines of "Well I'm not exactly dealing with FDR or JFK myself".Malcolm Armsteen wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2026 7:40 pm Autocutie on Sky News almost wetting herself over Trump saying Starmer 'isn't Churchill'. Palpable glee.Of course Starmer isn't Churchill, we don't need a Churchill, we're not at war.
Oboogie wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2026 11:04 pmHe's possibly dealing with Gerald Ford.Spoonman wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2026 10:32 pmHe isn't even dealing with Nixon!Oboogie wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2026 9:29 pmWon't happen 'cos he's diplomatic, but I'd love to see Starmer reply along the lines of "Well I'm not exactly dealing with FDR or JFK myself".
Of course Starmer isn't Churchill, we don't need a Churchill, we're not at war.
- By davidjay
What possible use would Diane Abbott's opinio[…]
