By Youngian
#107737
What's Reeves supposed to be doing to stop this alledged blatant profiteering?
Weldon's right, blame Netanyahu and Trump. As they are to blame.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#107749
This is where we are now. Difference of opinion between the PM and one advisor is now "misleading Parliament". Absolutely ridiculous stuff.
Q: [Rigby’s second question] Last week we learned that Jonathan Powell, your national security adviser, thought the Mandelson appointment was rushed. But you told MPs due process was followed. Did you mislead parliament?

Starmer replied: “No.” He said Sir Laurie Magnus, his ethics adviser, looked at this question last week (in response to a complaint from the Tories) and concluded that the proper process was followed.
The Weeping Angel liked this
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#107751
There’s not even an obvious contradiction in terms of opinion there. Powell thought it a bit rushed. Starmer said proper process followed. It’s not like Powell said “you didn’t follow the proper process”.
Oboogie liked this
  • 1
  • 274
  • 275
  • 276
  • 277
  • 278
Kemi Badenoch

https://bsky.app/profile/thomasig.bsky.social/post[…]

Iranian Conflict

It's almost as if he had no idea what he was […]

I'd like to share Mr Neil's bafflement […]

Reform Party

https://bsky.app/profile/peterwalker99.bsky.social[…]