Ah, the old "I'd support those houses if they were council houses" approach. Not those solar panels there. In fairness, all parties tend to be nimby when it's something big near them, but they're not posing as the only people who get climate change.
In other news, Zack's comic does another "Isn't Hannah Spencer lovely and cool?"
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... hounds-ban
Green MP: Labour caricatures working-class people over greyhound racing
Hannah Spencer says minister ‘continuously offends people by saying working-class people don’t care about dogs’
I couldn't care less if greyhound racing is banned. I think it probably will be in the not too distant future. But I'm struggling to find a quote of Labour "saying working class people don't care about dogs". I've certainly seen people speculate that Labour think it would lose them votes to ban it, but that's not the same thing. Quotes in the article from Nandy point out, quite accurately, that it's a popular sport, and big industry. Governments don't tend to rush to ban these things.
Just in case you don't think Labour are the baddies here, the article points out.
Labour has close ties to the gambling industry, taking hundreds of thousands of pound in donations during the general election campaign. Senior figures have been invited to glitzy events held by betting lobbyists.
Alas no space to point out that the Budget raised an extra billion of tax off gambling.
I like that she rehomed greyhounds, but she's already shown herself to be a self-righteous bullshitter, who as far as I know hasn't engaged with people who pointed out that subsidizing high energy users in a rich country will mean people in poor countries can't even cook.
And look who else has shown up? I admire his gambling work, but he's not an academic expert or anything, and he hates Labour because they chucked Jez out.
Matt Zarb-Cousin, a co-founder of Gamban, an app that helps people with gambling addictions, said: “The gambling lobby in Westminster has had successive governments believing they somehow speak for the working class while their sector exploits and extracts from it. To make the assumption ordinary working people somehow don’t care about the welfare of dogs is a form of class prejudice.
Again, why do you have to be "class-prejudiced" because you won't ban a popular sport? This stuff is such guff.
We might reasonably ask, what's Hannah Spencer's policy on gambling? She wouldn't accept gambling hospitality (not that it did all that much good for the providers in terms of Labour raising extra tax), but what would she actually do?