User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#106347
davidjay wrote: Thu Feb 19, 2026 4:52 pm Pubs and churches. Both very English, both very popular with the Right. Both would be doing well if the people who say they like them ever went through their doors.
See also village shops.
By davidjay
#106363
There seems to be some obsessive narrative about pub closures being down to the government when in truth they've been closing since the war. I could give a dozen or more reasons, everything from post-industrialisation to Netflix, but the biggest one is that people, especially young people, don't drink anywhere near as much anymore. Maybe it's cost, maybe it's a reaction to the binge drinking of the previous generation, but the pub-going habit has been lost. Yet still the slur continues, with CAMRA being the biggest culprit. They won't tackle the PubCos and Tim Martin but they will attack the government.
User avatar
By Boiler
#106367
I dumped my CAMRA membership: one could argue that it has achieved its original aims therefore it doesn't really need to exist now.
By davidjay
#106369
Boiler wrote: Thu Feb 19, 2026 10:38 pm I dumped my CAMRA membership: one could argue that it has achieved its original aims therefore it doesn't really need to exist now.
I wouldn't agree with that, as proper beer and pubs still need to be promoted but their clear agenda puts me off. It seems that they'll attack anyone who's remote (government, international brewing conglomerates) but anyone who might do them a few favours (mid-sized brewers, JDW) get a free pass. Then there's their members, many of whom are a right royal pain in the arse.
User avatar
By Boiler
#106410
davidjay wrote: Thu Feb 19, 2026 10:56 pm
Boiler wrote: Thu Feb 19, 2026 10:38 pm I dumped my CAMRA membership: one could argue that it has achieved its original aims therefore it doesn't really need to exist now.
I wouldn't agree with that, as proper beer and pubs still need to be promoted but their clear agenda puts me off. It seems that they'll attack anyone who's remote (government, international brewing conglomerates) but anyone who might do them a few favours (mid-sized brewers, JDW) get a free pass. Then there's their members, many of whom are a right royal pain in the arse.
Some of whom, sadly, deserve the Davey Jones treatment.
img_3917-768x819.jpg
img_3917-768x819.jpg (241.69 KiB) Viewed 3307 times
Andy McDandy liked this
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#106419
Today's "just cough up more money, Reeves" article is relatively benign. £30m for the Southbank Centre.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... s-the-past

I love the Southbank Centre, and the point is made (fairly) that the Grade 2 listing will make it much harder to reconfigure the building so it can earn more income. But isn't this what the tourist tax is for? I'd not be surprised if Nandy thought that this £30m might usefully go outside London.
Last edited by Tubby Isaacs on Fri Feb 20, 2026 8:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#106583
The Guardian surely knows that Blair didn't "decide that everyone had to have a degree", but prints a letter to that effect anyway. And it probably knows that the 50% wasn't "young people", unless that terms has expanded to include 30 year olds.

Do they actually want the Reform narrative around universities to exist?

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2 ... iversities
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#106592
I can't tell whether it's that or "get Labour out and Zack takes over immediately". Either way, the Government has to go, I get that.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#109553
Crime isn't crime when it's done by middle class people, latest.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... arch-finds
The criminalisation of direct action climate protests in the UK is counterproductive and increases the determination of activists to undertake disruptive demonstrations, according to a study of 1,300 campaigners.

New findings suggest arrests, fines and lengthy prison sentences given to nonviolent climate protesters who have blocked roads or damaged buildings may actually radicalise them. The repression of protest could even be one driver of recent covert actions such as the cutting of internet cables, they said.
So no measure of actual offences committed or anything like that. They... spoke to people who don't want to go to prison who told them that being sent to prison is bad. I don't want to overdo the "middle class" aspect of this, but I'd guess these people want people who persistently commit crimes against people like them to be put in prison. Nobody would even think of doing a survey of burglars or car thieves and attaching meaning to them saying prison was bad for them.

If people say "going into prison has only confirmed my determination to come out and commit crime" then a logical response is to put them in prison for longer. Sure, non custodial stuff can work, but it can only work if you obey court orders, pay fines. That's not something lots of these people are prepared to do.
By davidjay
#109581
Isn't this just the equivalent of Mail readers saying that speeding isn't a real crime, because it's something they could be prosecuted for?
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#109586
Similar place, for sure. As long as the intentions are good, it's not a real crime. "I'm trying to save the planet"/"Hey, I didn't run anyone over" - both followed up by something about catching real criminals.
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#109606
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Sat Apr 25, 2026 11:28 am Crime isn't crime when it's done by middle class people, latest.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... arch-finds
The criminalisation of direct action climate protests in the UK is counterproductive and increases the determination of activists to undertake disruptive demonstrations, according to a study of 1,300 campaigners.

New findings suggest arrests, fines and lengthy prison sentences given to nonviolent climate protesters who have blocked roads or damaged buildings may actually radicalise them. The repression of protest could even be one driver of recent covert actions such as the cutting of internet cables, they said.
So no measure of actual offences committed or anything like that. They... spoke to people who don't want to go to prison who told them that being sent to prison is bad. I don't want to overdo the "middle class" aspect of this, but I'd guess these people want people who persistently commit crimes against people like them to be put in prison. Nobody would even think of doing a survey of burglars or car thieves and attaching meaning to them saying prison was bad for them.

If people say "going into prison has only confirmed my determination to come out and commit crime" then a logical response is to put them in prison for longer. Sure, non custodial stuff can work, but it can only work if you obey court orders, pay fines. That's not something lots of these people are prepared to do.
There's more here.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/ ... 1777101633
Eve Middleton was sitting on a picnic blanket in a park, sharing out vegan biscuits with six fellow activists, when she saw a squad of police bearing down on them. About 30 officers, she said, surrounded the seven young people, and one officer told them: “Don’t run or you’ll be cuffed.”

Another officer focused on gathering evidence. “Whose Oreos are these?” they asked, seizing the biscuits.

“It was pretty farcical, but it’s still frightening when you see that amount of officers running towards you. It’s pretty scary,” said student Bridie Leggatt, another of the seven.

The seven activists had gathered for a “nonviolence training event” – meeting in the park to enjoy the sunny weather.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#109610
I'm shocked that nicking stuff might mean prosecution.

This chap's not exactly Engels, is he? "Profiting off other people misery", or as some of us would put it, "selling stuff to people at a low margin".
Another of those arrested last weekend, who would only give his name as Mark, said mass shoplifting would have “no real effect” on supermarkets who make billions of pounds in profit.

“Supermarkets are profiting off other people’s misery and we can’t put up with that,” said Middleton, pointing out that Tesco’s chief executive, Ken Murphy, was paid £9.2m last year, about 400 times that of the shop’s typical worker.

What about the effect on low-paid staff? Will they not risk losing their jobs if mass shoplifting has an effect on company profits?

“It shouldn’t be staff that get cut,” said Mark, 44, who works in education. “What should get cut are the obscene profits and salaries of the chief executives.”
Yeah. Famously, losses always come off the chief executive's salary, Mark
Keir Starmer

Napoleon? Lula in Brazil regained the presidency […]

The Greens

https://twitter.com/lukejcr/status/204848548545925[…]

Those upon the political Right...

Casting my mind back to growing up in that area, I[…]

Over in America...

I suspect they're employing Star Wars stormtr[…]