- Wed May 13, 2026 11:21 am
#110482
I see Raphael Behr has become the latest to bemoan "red lines" on Europe. Yet the only one that matters seems to be on Freedom of Movement. How can the response to the local elections (with a higher turnout than normal) be Freedom of Movement? It won't be, whoever takes over from Starmer. There are more specific arguments on student fees, visa numbers that are holding back agreement on the reset, but these don't strike me as anything bigger than you normally get in these discussions. They'll get resolved, probably a month or two later than they could have done, but does that matter that much?
The Kings Speech will apparently have a bill on dynamic alignment. This is a huge principle to concede. Behr can read his own paper as well as I can. Why do none of these commentators mention that, but keep coming up with the same stuff about how Kipper Starmer is insisting on unreasonably red lines?
The Kings Speech will apparently have a bill on dynamic alignment. This is a huge principle to concede. Behr can read his own paper as well as I can. Why do none of these commentators mention that, but keep coming up with the same stuff about how Kipper Starmer is insisting on unreasonably red lines?

- By mattomac