By Bones McCoy
#109868
Waiting for the pub in question to get a "No Fat Chicks" * banner.

* Yes, it's old, 1970's american origin I believe and grossly offensive.
But I'll make an exception for old gasbag Connolly.
User avatar
By Boiler
#110556
I suspect she's avoided a recall because she's not saying anything worse than many others do in the cesspit that is Twatter.

Also, without disappearing into conspiracy theories, I always have this nagging feeling that a lot of people like her and her fellow travellers are being protected somehow.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#110560
davidjay wrote: Thu May 14, 2026 8:56 am And again - how has she avoided a recall?
You probably know the way it works- there are a list of conditions, and they're fairly usually fairly straightforward. Not to miss meetings with the Probation officer, that sort of thing- lots of prisoners with drug habits immediately do that, and go back in. Then there's "don't visit this place where the person you attacked lives". And obviously criminal offences.

I'd have thought she should have had a condition not to post at all on social media, but seems like she doesn't. I don't know what condition this would break. It's obviously libelous, but that's a different point.
By mattomac
#110563
Killer Whale wrote: Thu May 14, 2026 9:47 am How the fuck does she get a blue tick? Did she pay for it? Who is financing her?
I assume for a grifter like her £11 a month isn't that much.

Of course Starmer wasn't but I doubt she has the attention span for five minutes to read something.
By davidjay
#110673
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Thu May 14, 2026 10:09 am
davidjay wrote: Thu May 14, 2026 8:56 am And again - how has she avoided a recall?
You probably know the way it works- there are a list of conditions, and they're fairly usually fairly straightforward. Not to miss meetings with the Probation officer, that sort of thing- lots of prisoners with drug habits immediately do that, and go back in. Then there's "don't visit this place where the person you attacked lives". And obviously criminal offences.

I'd have thought she should have had a condition not to post at all on social media, but seems like she doesn't. I don't know what condition this would break. It's obviously libelous, but that's a different point.
I haven't got much knowledge of the conditions but I would have thought they include something along the lines of admitting you were guilty and promising not to do it, or anything like it, again. Abusing all and sundry would surely be doing just that.
  • 1
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
Labour, generally.

Would be fine if it wasn’t going take severa[…]

Keir Starmer

Regardless of Burnham. The whole circus looks ter[…]

Those upon the political Right...

She's not committing another criminal offence[…]

More like Brian Marwood. When he was an analyst[…]