User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#110667
He can look at the numbers as well as the next man, and he's not going to get a better chance. He has to go for it.
By mattomac
#110668
What happens if he loses?

And is the party hanging around for it to happen… Yeah that looks really good for the country.

Not like anything else is happening in the world in which we can say, yeah ok we will get back to you in due course sit tight and play amongst yourselves.

It’s more embarrassing than 3 PMs in a month.
Last edited by mattomac on Thu May 14, 2026 7:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Oboogie, Boiler liked this
By Oboogie
#110670
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Thu May 14, 2026 6:01 pm No way the NEC can turn him down again.
Why not? What's changed since February?
Burnham still has two years to serve in his "dream job" as Mayor of Manchester, is that no-longer important?
Last edited by Oboogie on Thu May 14, 2026 7:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#110672
On the plus side there shouldn't be any more resignations, a new health secretary is appointed, and Starmer is safe again.

I'm pleased about this.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#110674
Oboogie wrote: Thu May 14, 2026 7:05 pm
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Thu May 14, 2026 6:01 pm No way the NEC can turn him down again.
Why not? What's changed since February?
Burnham still has two years to serve in his "dream job" as Mayor of Manchester, is that no-longer important?
Far more people think he's needed in Westminster than did before, that's the difference. And there'd be resignations if he was blocked again.
User avatar
By Abernathy
#110675
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Thu May 14, 2026 6:52 pm He can look at the numbers as well as the next man, and he's not going to get a better chance. He has to go for it.
Perhaps, if that really is the nature of his driving ambition. But as I’ve already said, it looks increasingly like a massive gamble on Burnham’s part. Which, in my view, does him no credit whatsoever.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#110679
I was as critical as anyone over his Denton and Gorton antics, but he's not the main problem now. The problem is idiot MPs, who have made it clear they'll piss Starmer about if they can't get him out. So you're looking at the best replacement, and it's him. With the bonus he shuts lots of these MPs up.

All politicians are ambitious. If an MP in a college town keels over tonight, Zack Polanski forgets how honored he is to served on the London Assembly. Farage is ambitious (or at least says he is, I'm not sure he'll want to stop the grift). Badnoch and Ed Davey are ambitious. People know politicians are ambitious.
mattomac, Boiler liked this
User avatar
By Abernathy
#110680
Yes, I do get that, of course. But I still think it represents a massive gamble on Burnham’s part. I dare say he deserves a measure of credit for going for it nevertheless. Tom Watson has blogged a very rational assessment of the whole mess, which I’ve posted on another thread. Worth reading.
Tubby Isaacs liked this
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#110681
Polly Toynbee has to her credit at least mentioned the good policies. But here's what she thinks Labour are doing wrong.
Some essentials cost nothing: electoral reform, abolishing the House of Lords, while accelerating rejoining the EU. It’s baffling that this government has been so timid.
What does "accelerating rejoining the EU" even mean in practice? We aren't rejoining, and the EU would tell us to come back when there was cross party consensus. So I'm not baffled.

Nor am I baffled that electoral reform (ruled out at the last election) is not being pursued. That would be incredibly dodgy.

Ask Andy Burnham if he fancies running in Makerfield on the basis of this stuff.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#110684
Starmer’s not opposing Burnham’s return, per Pippa Crerar.

Don’t know how long it takes from here.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#110699
Great work here by these two.
The Merseyside MP Paula Barker, an ally of Andy Burnham, has suggested financial markets would “have to fall into line” should the Greater Manchester mayor find a route to Downing Street.

Meanwhile, the leftwing grandee Diane Abbott suggested that MPs “might as well go home” if bond market considerations trumped other priorities.
A lot of sarcastic leftists do the "na na na, the sensibles" stuff. I take "sensibles" as meaning people who don't talk rubbish like this. Because this talk is utterly disqualifying.

Andy Burnham may have some work to do to put distance between himself and supporters like this.
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#110701
What's the old saying about money and bullshit?
  • 1
  • 190
  • 191
  • 192
  • 193
  • 194
Those upon the political Right...

My old English teacher would have an absolute fi[…]

Labour Government 2024 - ?

I don't know if the Burnham news will finally[…]

Keir Starmer

What's the old saying about money and bullshi[…]

Even by his standards that's awful.