User avatar
By Killer Whale
#99277
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Wed Nov 05, 2025 8:50 pm
David Lammy under pressure as two more prisoners mistakenly freed
https://www.theguardian.com/society/202 ... -in-london

Under pressure on radio phone-ins no doubt. But this isn't a new problem, so the Guardian should do better than lead with this. One of the men is indeed a foreign sex offender. The other is a fraudster.
The right have queered their own pitch on this. The Algerian guy was not an asylum seeker, but does appear to be an illegal immigrant, having overstayed his visa. Since the right (and I'm talking all the way from the Tories to Yaxley-Lennon's bunch of charmers) have consciously conflated the terms 'asylum seeker' and 'illegal immigrant' they have nowhere to go in attempting to ramp up the outrage.

'Foreign sex offender' appears to be the best they can do, as if being 'foreign' is some kind of transgression or aggravating factor, and even then the 'sex offence' appears to have been relatively minor.

Kudos to the BBC, by the way, for giving the good old British fraudster equal weight in their coverage.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#99285
Wandsworth Prison had the high profile escape a while back. It may not be in the best of operational shape. But apparently it’s totally unfair for the government to talk of the mess they inherited because they’ve had 16 months, and have a large majority.

Surprised the BBC were balanced. Charter renewal focussing some minds?
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#99288
A (small) charge per mile for electric cars will be in budget, it seems.

I hadn’t seen that coming. Reeves’s late budget was laughed at, as if it was purely a Micawber thing, but seems like they’ve done some proper work. Tax will have to switch to per mile at some point, might as well start with a modest charge now.

In the way of these things, I confidently predict that this will get slagged off as a petrol head subsidy and she’ll be accused of ruining the market for electric cars. Because nothing can ever change ever, when it’s a Labour government.
By Youngian
#99292
In the way of these things, I confidently predict that this will get slagged off as a petrol head subsidy and she’ll be accused of ruining the market for electric cars. Because nothing can ever change ever, when it’s a Labour government.

Petrol heads won't rejoice at road pricing (or any tax). Its inevitable that it would replace fuel duty as petrol engine sales plummeted.
mattomac liked this
By mattomac
#99293
I do wonder if they will do a sleight of hand with the tax bands, a bit like Brown but in reverse, does seem if you wish the burden not to fall on them with the least amount which is a phrase both Reeves and Starmer have used in the past frequently that would be the best bet.

Anyhow I think with anything like this leave it to the sources who are about as reliable as Lord Haw Haw and see what it comes up with, I predict many won't be happy.

As for the prison release it's all Lammy's fault according to Mason, which is odd as I am sure hes only been in the role a month.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#99298
It's one of these things that sounds impossible to the general public, but it's more like "Health Secretary under pressure as bed pan falls on the floor" to paraphrase Aneurin Bevan, or rather something he may never have said.

Similarly the public think that prisoners are always carted around in secure vans. Of course, the big majority of them aren't gang bosses, and that would be incredibly wasteful. This actually bit the Major Government on the arse when Group 4 lost a few prisoners, but I'm sure that wasn't unknown with the Prison Service either.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#99302
Banks poised to escape tax rises in Rachel Reeves’s budget
UK bank shares rise after reports, with chancellor wanting sector to remain competitive to help economic growth
Probably fair. I don't trust the figures produced by bank lobby groups that suggest they're taxed more than other financial centers, but just in terms of other businesses, they don't seem to be undertaxed. Partners in big law/accountancy firms look much more candidates for that, as they don't pay NI. I hope that changes. I'm not ruling out a general business tax increase, of course, just a special ones for banks.

I'm not convinced by the Farage argument that you can just stop paying interest on deposits that banks have with the Bank of England. Those deposits come from investors who want interest paid to them, so it's not free money.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#99309
Thanks, Lucy.
Lucy Powell, Labour’s new deputy leader, has said the government should stand by its manifesto commitment not to raise income tax, national insurance or VAT, amid signs that it may be preparing to break that promise.

Powell, who left Keir Starmer’s cabinet in the reshuffle before being elected deputy leader last month, said the budget needed to be about putting more money, not less, into ordinary people’s pocket
Doubtless cuts to anything at all are wrong too, and a load more spending.
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#99315
The Labour Party's membership's ability to choose the least suitable candidate for any rôle is unerring.
Our nutters are just as bad as the Tory nutters, in their own way.

I despair...
User avatar
By Abernathy
#99319
Indeed. Why do the likes of Lucy seem to have zero understanding of Realpolitik?

Ditchiing the manifesto pledge is essential, and unavoidable. What good will “sticking to our pledge” do us when the economy continues to stagnate and everything continues to be shite for the next three years ? One term government, and worse, shaped like Nigel fucking Farage, beckons. :-(.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#99328
Does she actually believe this "just put money in people's pockets" stuff? Reminds me of Burnham's "don't worry about the bond markets" stuff. She'll be on to "just tax the rich" and "just rejoin the EU" in a few weeks, probably with "FFS" for good measure.

Are the members particularly against increasing income tax in the circumstances? I'd certainly do other stuff- hope that fuel duty isn't frozen- but can't see how at least 1p can be avoided. Perhaps 2 if the employers NI rise is undone. That would be extremely tough for a lot of people, but at least it would be a bit of redistribution towards working people as opposed to pensioners and rentiers.
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#99331
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Thu Nov 06, 2025 5:11 pm Thanks, Lucy.
Lucy Powell, Labour’s new deputy leader, has said the government should stand by its manifesto commitment not to raise income tax, national insurance or VAT, amid signs that it may be preparing to break that promise.

Powell, who left Keir Starmer’s cabinet in the reshuffle before being elected deputy leader last month, said the budget needed to be about putting more money, not less, into ordinary people’s pocket
Doubtless cuts to anything at all are wrong too, and a load more spending.
This is why I voted for Bridget.
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#99337
Meanwhile.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cpwv0nr72pyo
Lisa Nandy has been found to have "unknowingly" breached public appointment rules with her choice to be the boss of England's new football watchdog.

The culture secretary named sports rights executive David Kogan as the government's preferred choice to run the new regulator in April.

But she later stood back from the process, after establishing that Mr Kogan had donated £2,900 to her 2020 Labour leadership campaign, according to a report.

Sir William Shawcross, the commissioner for public appointments, said Nandy should have checked beforehand and taken "any necessary consequential action".
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#99341
This doesn't look great. Surprised that William Shawcross is measured there, because he's a hard right hack. Looks like he's ripe for replacement, being 79 and having protested Roman Polanski's arrest in 2009.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#99342
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: Thu Nov 06, 2025 5:59 pm The Labour Party's membership's ability to choose the least suitable candidate for any rôle is unerring.
Our nutters are just as bad as the Tory nutters, in their own way.

I despair...
Could have been a lot worse. Had the rules not been changed, someone like Clive Lewis would have got it, with a combination of continuity Jez members and "just rejoin FFS" and "just bring in PR FFS".
  • 1
  • 203
  • 204
  • 205
  • 206
  • 207
Guardian

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/nov[…]

Labour Government 2024 - ?

The Labour Party's membership's abilit[…]

Kemi Badenoch

I think even Kemi's shut up about the Reeves […]

Trump 2.0 Lunacy

Level is approximately zero. He's right it�[…]