User avatar
By Watchman
#99650
The thought occurs: is all this Trump stuff, also an underhand attempt to bring in some "ground rules", to pre-empt the Epstein dam finally breaking.
User avatar
By Boiler
#99656
Do these "Epstein Files" even exist? Like that mythical video tape?

Or are they a dream caused by eating too much blue cheese before bedtime?
By Youngian
#99657
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Tue Nov 11, 2025 11:29 am A man has a take. As someone BTL says, this is like saying "fantastic, the Tories are disappearing".

These shortcomings are not the reasons for the attack on the BBC but what they dont do enough of. Which is intense scrutiny of demagogues used to basking in the applause of their supporters rather than being challenge. Its not just the BBC in the sights of the far right but all reputable news gathering organisations. Witness Farage yesterday getting techy at a Sky reporter questioning his friend of the worker credentials.
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#99659
To use an analogy, if someone's trying to crash your house party, letting them in won't turn them into the perfect guest. They'll just use your phone to call their mates round to wreck the place because the soft cunt won't fight back.
By mattomac
#99665
Maybe the BBC could stop reporting on Trump, no one would miss the news items about whatever written shite hes written that day on truth social.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#99667
FFS. "Prorogation" wasn't a coup. The Government won the case in the lower courts.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#99670
Apologies for reminding everyone of the existence of Liz. Here she is with that straight talking common sense which today's young people, with their media studies degrees, don't have. "It's in the Telegraph!"

User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#99672
Heavyweight jurist pronounces, invoking the timeless legal principle that the side he dislikes automatically loses.

User avatar
By Abernathy
#99692
Please read Dorian Lynskey’s assessment .

https://www.thenerve.news/p/bbc-tim-da ... 3c7a23fc28
One of the foundational errors this Labour government made was passively inheriting a slate of Tory appointees to public bodies, including the BBC, but I think Gibb has badly overplayed his hand. Culture secretary Lisa Nandy now has a choice. She can continue to allow the BBC to be sabotaged by rightwing activists who despise, among other things, the Labour party. Or she can, as far as her powers allow, wrest the corporation back from the pernicious influence of people like Gibb, strengthen its independence, and let the BBC breathe again.
Oboogie liked this
User avatar
By Watchman
#99699
The big challenge for that to happen is, who could take that on, and be “acceptable” to all
  • 1
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
Labour Government 2024 - ?

Spot the outright lie here. Plus the very questi[…]

Trump 2.0 Lunacy

It'll either be Trump or MBS.

The BBC

The big challenge for that to happen is, who cou[…]

Guardian

Education's an odd one. Going by coverage i[…]