Christ. This is indeed "brave". Unless it's a joke.
Hundreds of thousands to lose heat pump subsidies in Reeves’s budget planThe subsidies seem pretty high, but I wouldn't cut them too far. Subsidies for new technologies often go to the better off. But I do actually accept the logic that high bills are a big problem for the Government, and that there's a danger of losing support for the cost of net zero, so I think something has to be done about that. I'm glad that's not my problem.
Exclusive: Supporters say grants largely going to middle-class households, but experts warn move will slow transition from gas boilers
kreuzberger wrote: ↑Thu Nov 13, 2025 9:55 pm I'm still struggling to fathom this, to be honest.Depends if you think the original approach was in good faith. I certainly wouldn't trust Mason and Wickham not to plant the lily let alone gild it. Some of it looked incredibly like bullshit. How for instance would you know that 50 front benchers were prepared to resign to push Starmer out? That sounds like somebody might have said something like "we'd have to take action like Tory MPs did with Boris Johnson". Or even the journo said that, and somebody agreed, and it gets put as a quote. Nobody can ever check this stuff.
A bunch of our finest scribblers messages Starmer's phalanx with their juicy copy-fodder. These easily identifiable individuals eagerly reply as the night wears on and turns in to tomorrow. It's all reported verbatim until Streeting waves it away with a zeitgeist-appropriate reference to Traitors - what ever that is.
Job done. Case closed. Train to Manchester.
Number 10 is now taking the piss.