Page 9 of 10
Re: The Times
Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2026 8:42 pm
by The Weeping Angel
Re: The Times
Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2026 9:55 pm
by Andy McDandy
Oh wow, that headbanger!
Mailwatchers of a certain vintage might recall his rather creepy party plans, and his claim to convert people to his cause via the "Touch of Aryus".
Re: The Times
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2026 7:17 pm
by The Weeping Angel
How dare Phillipe Sands receive money from his client? Does he think he's a lawyer or something?
Re: The Times
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2026 8:24 pm
by Oboogie
The Weeping Angel wrote: ↑Tue Feb 10, 2026 8:42 pm
cf I posted the original C4 piece about this cunt in the far-right thread last week.
Re: The Times
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2026 8:36 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
The Weeping Angel wrote: ↑Wed Feb 18, 2026 7:17 pm
How dare Phillipe Sands receive money from his client? Does he think he's a lawyer or something?
Sounds like it's, if anything, even less outrageous than that. From the paper well known for its law reports.
Re: The Times
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2026 10:13 pm
by The Weeping Angel
Stupid, Attorney_General not letting us join in with Trump's war.
Re: The Times
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2026 6:05 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
From Yougov.
With the US, alongside Israel, launching its much-anticipated attack on Iran over the weekend, initial data from Monday 2 March found Britons opposed to the attacks by 49% to 28%.
And in the US?
A new Hart Research Associates/Public Opinion Strategies poll conducted for NBC News found 54 percent of American voters disapprove of Trump’s handling of the situation in Iran and 41 percent approve.
Wolfson and Finkelstein care to explain that?
Re: The Times
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2026 6:41 pm
by Andy McDandy
I remember a Times editorial from a few years ago (Iraq war) arguing that Germany could not be considered a 'serious' country unless it committed troops to the effort.
Rupert loves his big bangs...
Re: The Times
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2026 9:36 pm
by mattomac
The same conflict that would take 4-5 days, the 4-5 weeks and now is being suggested until September.
We’ve seen how this plays out before.
Re: The Times
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2026 11:37 pm
by Bones McCoy
mattomac wrote: ↑Thu Mar 05, 2026 9:36 pm
The same conflict that would take 4-5 days, the 4-5 weeks and now is being suggested until September.
We’ve seen how this plays out before.
Three day special military operation.
Re: The Times
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2026 8:51 pm
by The Weeping Angel
Re: The Times
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2026 9:13 am
by Killer Whale
No nannies? The horror!
Re: The Times
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2026 10:29 am
by Bones McCoy
The Weeping Angel wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2026 8:51 pm
Times invades Telegraph's "Hard up poshos" lane.
Somebody tell that that Austen and Tolstoy already won that game.
Re: The Times
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2026 8:08 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
I see Seb Payne is going with "it's really unfair lots of young women don't want to date supporters of an insane psychopath and adjudicated rapist". This is just like the Manosphere.
Re: The Times
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2026 9:13 pm
by Andy McDandy
In all honesty, I'm surprised that only 35% of young women have had enough of men.
Re: The Times
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2026 9:06 pm
by Youngian
This seems to be a new bugbear by the headbangers. Didn't Rowan Pelling used to write middle class porn? And still targeting men who can't pull.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/0 ... femospher/
Re: The Times
Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2026 10:14 am
by Bones McCoy
Telegraph Hacks fail to score during spring break - take it badly.
Re: The Times
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2026 8:01 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Re: The Times
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2026 8:15 pm
by Youngian
John & Margaret are an amusing spoof account highlighting first world problems
Re: The Times
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2026 8:35 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Ha ha, that's very good.