Page 10 of 11

Re: The Liberal Democrats, generally

Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2025 4:33 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
The Lib Dems have responded to water bill rises by... calling for the abolition of Ofwat. The bills are rising (mostly) to pay for extra investment to build sewers and reservoirs. You can bet the Lib Dems will be in full "localist" mode complaining if sewage isn't reduced.

Still, this sort of stuff worked for Nick Clegg.

Re: The Liberal Democrats, generally

Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2025 8:26 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Some fantastic Lib Dem performances in by-elections yesterday, including in Preston. I think Labour might get a fair few of these voters in 2029 where it needs them (lots of the current abstainers/don't know will be Labour in places like that. But it's not great for Kemi Jenrick. Claire Coutihno in East Surrey may be one of several to have a problem if Davey thinks he's got the capacity to take her on.

Re: The Liberal Democrats, generally

Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2025 6:07 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Lib Dems to force vote on creating new customs union with EU
Ed Davey’s party believes the move is the best way to ‘turbocharge’ economy, rather than tax rises
Look at this rubbish. By all means, make the case for trying to negotiate a Customs Union. But, in the unlikely event of the EU being sufficiently interested, it would take a long time. He's seen how long the Starmer deal has taken (summit in main, negotiating mandate only just agreed). So the idea this removes the need for tax rises is absolute nonsense.

If you want to "turbocharge", surely you'd need the Single Market. Davey obviously thinks freedom of movement would be too unpopular,, which is the same position as Starmer. So what exactly is the difference between them, except Davey is playing dynamic Bozo to Starmer's Theresa May? We know how that ended.

I note this.
The Lib Dem plans propose a bespoke customs union with the EU by 2030, suggesting it could be similar to the one it has had with Turkey since 1995.
Nobody seems to think much of the EU-Turkey arrangement. What exactly is the benefit of it without the Single Market as well?

Re: The Liberal Democrats, generally

Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2025 10:25 pm
by Youngian
The benefits are negotiating leverage which is geopolitical as much as economic. The big economic calls have been made in international trade, the main agenda for Europe is preserving the gains and seeing to it that Trump doesn't totally destroy the international order.
Any perks the UK gains over the EU with the US is either Trump eccentricity or a malevolent attempt to yank Britain away from Europe's orbit. America no longer has allies, its a transactional power.

Re: The Liberal Democrats, generally

Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2025 8:23 pm
by The Weeping Angel


Where's George?

Re: The Liberal Democrats, generally

Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2025 11:02 pm
by mattomac
What vote is he trying to win with that?

Re: The Liberal Democrats, generally

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2025 1:36 am
by Malcolm Armsteen
mattomac wrote: Thu Nov 27, 2025 11:02 pm What vote is he trying to win with that?
Greens?

Re: The Liberal Democrats, generally

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2025 12:08 pm
by Abernathy
So, Rachel Reeves is really spiderman, but so are Kwasi Kwarteng, Rishi Sunak, Nadim Zahawi, and others.

Me no understandee.

Re: The Liberal Democrats, generally

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2025 12:20 pm
by Youngian
Abernathy wrote: Fri Nov 28, 2025 12:08 pm So, Rachel Reeves is really spiderman, but so are Kwasi Kwarteng, Rishi Sunak, Nadim Zahawi, and others.

Me no understandee.
Its a popular meme from a Spiderman comic in which the real Spiderman points at Spiderman impersonator.

Davey should stick to his one job of keeping fiscally prudent right of centre former Tory voters onside.

Re: The Liberal Democrats, generally

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2025 11:22 pm
by mattomac
Silly Rachel, she didn't get an agreement with the 27 member states to bring in a customs union and at the same time rejoin the EU.

Anyhow no longer my MP, so fuck him.

Re: The Liberal Democrats, generally

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2025 9:43 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Can someone explain this? The stealth tax on high streets is what? Not cutting VAT or using some powers it had?



Re: The Liberal Democrats, generally

Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2025 5:38 pm
by mattomac
Was reported in the Mail I saw this morning which tells you a fair bit.

Apparently the high streets are a bustling hive of activity currently….

Re: The Liberal Democrats, generally

Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2025 5:45 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
There might be something in the budget. I'm genuinely all ears. But they're a pretty deceitful party, and I want to hear chapter and verse. This is an outright lie. The UK's digital tax only goes when an international version of it comes in.


Re: The Liberal Democrats, generally

Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2025 5:49 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
This "pay for everything with the customs union" is not unlike when UKIP paid for everything by leaving the EU. I suppose it's better in that it's possible, but not now, certainly not with Davey's own red lines which seem to be the same as Starmer's, and the EU would want a hefty payment for it.

Re: The Liberal Democrats, generally

Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2025 10:43 am
by Tubby Isaacs
Isn't this basically bollocks?


Re: The Liberal Democrats, generally

Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2025 10:45 am
by Boiler
Because they all arrived in or under lorries, hence the massive fines introduced to encourage truckers to check their vehicles?

Re: The Liberal Democrats, generally

Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2025 10:58 am
by Tubby Isaacs
We were receiving more than we were "sending back" under the Dublin Agreement.

Seems much more likely that the facilitators changed their business model for the reason you say.

Re: The Liberal Democrats, generally

Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2025 12:45 pm
by Youngian
Going high while they go low or playing by Queensbury Rules doesn't work on the Farages and Johnsons of this world. Daisy Cooper probably wouldn't try this stuff on with Labour or pre Johnson Tories as they did research and had the facts at their fingertips.

Re: The Liberal Democrats, generally

Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2025 12:51 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
It is against Labour too. Part of the “just rejoin ffs” bollocks.

Re: The Liberal Democrats, generally

Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2025 6:08 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
There were 13 Labour MPs, Ed. The vast majority told you your 10 Minute Rule Bill vote for something that isn't on offer was a waste of time. To my considerable surprise, Clive Lewis wasn't one of the 13. Several Corbynites (including Richard Burgon) vote for it though- never thought of these as a particularly pro-EU bunch.