Page 92 of 116
Re: Reform Party
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2025 11:27 pm
by Boiler
Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Sun Sep 14, 2025 8:11 pm
davidjay wrote: ↑Sun Sep 14, 2025 7:53 pm
It's a cob.
It's a bap.
Now, to me a cob is crusty whilst a bap is slightly larger and soft. Unfortunately, I associate 'cob' with 30p Lee these days.
Re: Reform Party
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2025 7:50 am
by Abernathy
Nigel Farage is 5ft 8in.
Re: Reform Party
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2025 11:28 am
by Tubby Isaacs
Danny Kruger has defected to Reform. Is he going to risk a by-election? The Lib Dems might fancy it.
Re: Reform Party
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2025 11:34 am
by Boiler
Kruger the Kunt defects. There's a surprise.
This is something I've never understood - why a sitting MP's defection to another party doesn't automatically trigger a by-election. After all, the electorate elected someone on the basis of the party they stood for.
Why doesn't it? And should it?
Re: Reform Party
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2025 11:38 am
by davidjay
Boiler wrote: ↑Mon Sep 15, 2025 11:34 am
Kruger the Kunt defects. There's a surprise.
This is something I've never understood - why a sitting MP's defection to another party doesn't automatically trigger a by-election?
Why doesn't it?
Because you vote for the individual rather than the party.
Re: Reform Party
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2025 11:39 am
by Boiler
davidjay wrote: ↑Mon Sep 15, 2025 11:38 am
Boiler wrote: ↑Mon Sep 15, 2025 11:34 am
Kruger the Kunt defects. There's a surprise.
This is something I've never understood - why a sitting MP's defection to another party doesn't automatically trigger a by-election?
Why doesn't it?
Because you vote for the individual rather than the party.
But that individual represents a party.
Re: Reform Party
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2025 12:07 pm
by Youngian
As there's no law against changing parties without triggering a by-election, why would any party want to introduce one?
East Wiltshire sounds like the sort of Tory middle England the LDs could take. The electoral arithmetic is much more tricky.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Wi ... stituency)
Re: Reform Party
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2025 12:27 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Mon Sep 15, 2025 11:28 am
Danny Kruger has defected to Reform. Is he going to risk a by-election? The Lib Dems might fancy it.
Fash of a feather flock together...
Re: Reform Party
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2025 1:03 pm
by kreuzberger
Anyone who voted for that crackpot must have known what they were getting.
Re: Reform Party
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2025 1:31 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Lots of people don’t know their local MP. They might get to know him better in a by-election campaign. So that’s why I don’t think there’ll be one. Easier to get MPs to switch if they don’t risk losing their seats.
Re: Reform Party
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2025 3:44 pm
by Bones McCoy
Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Mon Sep 15, 2025 11:28 am
Danny Kruger has defected to Reform. Is he going to risk a by-election? The Lib Dems might fancy it.
Rich kid playing Risk "Empire edition".
Unreformed Breoderbund Voortrekker surprises nobody.
Re: Reform Party
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2025 3:46 pm
by Bones McCoy
davidjay wrote: ↑Mon Sep 15, 2025 11:38 am
Boiler wrote: ↑Mon Sep 15, 2025 11:34 am
Kruger the Kunt defects. There's a surprise.
This is something I've never understood - why a sitting MP's defection to another party doesn't automatically trigger a by-election?
Why doesn't it?
Because you vote for the individual rather than the party.
It all worked so well in Oliver Cromwell's day - why change things now?
Re: Reform Party
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2025 3:54 pm
by Bones McCoy
Re: Reform Party
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2025 3:55 pm
by Youngian
Re: Reform Party
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2025 4:01 pm
by Bones McCoy
Spectator finger on the pulse.

Re: Reform Party
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2025 4:01 pm
by Bones McCoy
Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit.
Youngian wrote: ↑Mon Sep 15, 2025 3:55 pm
Re: Reform Party
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2025 4:20 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Ha ha ha ha. Paul "Real World" Embery there hyping up somebody who nobody takes seriously outside of "the media bubble".
Good thread on the sort of pseudo-intellectual tripe that Kruger and co push. Kruger may think Conservatism is more than free markets. I'd much rather the free marketeers than this rubbish, where the state does much more but somehow gets smaller.
Re: Reform Party
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2025 5:36 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
Nepo baby talks shit - amazing...
Re: Reform Party
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2025 5:45 pm
by satnav
I can't believe that Kruger is only 50. Being a right wing f**k wit really seems to age people. I can remember watching him on the Daily Politics earlier this year when he claimed that 'trans gender children just needed a good talking to.' I would love to see him in a comprehensive school trying to give a pupil a good talking. I don't think it would go well.
BBC news claimed that he was the first sitting Tory MP to defect to Reform but I thought that honour went to party hopping f**k wit Lee Anderson.
Every Tory who joins Reform just adds to the narrative that Reform are just Tory 2.0 but without any of almost human Tories.
Re: Reform Party
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2025 5:54 pm
by mattomac
Before Labour’s latest silliness they seemed to drop a couple of points amongst the reliable posts during their conference. I wonder if this was related to Dorries, anyhow I don’t think this harms Labour.