User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#13233
I wonder how that 'transparency' would sit alongside say, medical confidentiality?
User avatar
By Cyclist
#13234
I would assume a simple list of XXX(Lab) has paired with ZZZ(Con) without giving detailed reasons would be sufficient. It would serve the double purpose of showing who officially isn't there, and highlight the pairing should one of them show up and vote.
Telegraph

We're going to need a smaller nanoviolin.

I had the misfortune to hear Chris Felch on the To[…]

The Times

High Street bookies are taking a hammering from […]

Nonce Andrew's not a Prince

"Full Admiral" is: a) a wres[…]