Page 101 of 101

Re: GBeebies

Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2025 1:46 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Chinny reckon. That would have been brought up when the BBC sacked Clarkson.

Re: GBeebies

Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2025 2:34 pm
by Boiler
When Auntie got rid of that foursome of fuckwits they did get a black presenter (Rory Reid) who was actually very good. Then it descended into fucking Flintoff and McGuinness... :roll:

Re: GBeebies

Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2025 4:40 pm
by Youngian
Is there a market for the memoirs of a hard up ex TV producer and his imaginary life long battles with wokery? Piers Morgan thinks so.

Re: GBeebies

Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2025 6:25 pm
by Tubby Isaacs

Re: GBeebies

Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2025 7:26 pm
by Boiler
They're empty vessels?

Re: GBeebies

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2025 11:26 am
by Andy McDandy
https://www.thepoke.com/2025/11/13/gb-n ... it-better/

GBeebies joining in the BBC bashing, because nothing says patriotism like calling for your country's largest and oldest broadcaster to be destroyed because the US President doesn't like it. As commentators say, how has a small channel, with a tiny audience, and a history of largely poor broadcasting (the rest being risible) become so influential? Maybe because everyone thought it was a joke until it was too late.

Wankers.

Re: GBeebies

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2025 12:16 pm
by Boiler
Controversy generates outrage and clicks amongst the chattering classes and the metropolitan liberal elites.

Re: GBeebies

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2025 1:18 pm
by Youngian
Paul Marshall, the moneybags fascist who bankrolls GBN, claims he is a liberal who just wants to contribute to a more pluralist media landscape. Has he approached any left wing outfits like Novara Media with his millions to ugrade them to a news gathering organisations? Of course not, the lying racist cunt.

Re: GBeebies

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2025 3:24 pm
by davidjay
Andy McDandy wrote: Thu Nov 13, 2025 11:26 am https://www.thepoke.com/2025/11/13/gb-n ... it-better/

GBeebies joining in the BBC bashing, because nothing says patriotism like calling for your country's largest and oldest broadcaster to be destroyed because the US President doesn't like it. As commentators say, how has a small channel, with a tiny audience, and a history of largely poor broadcasting (the rest being risible) become so influential? Maybe because everyone thought it was a joke until it was too late.

Wankers.
How did a one-man pressure group manage to bring about the most catastrophic decision in modern British history? How did a tiny party get so much unquestioning media coverage? I have the horrible feeling that we have to accept there are more bigots out there than we'd like to admit

Re: GBeebies

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2025 3:25 pm
by Boiler
There are.

Re: GBeebies

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2025 4:07 pm
by Killer Whale
And they're fucking winning.

Re: GBeebies

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2025 4:16 pm
by Boiler
Indeed they are.

Re: GBeebies

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2025 5:10 pm
by mattomac
Because the Communists biggest "enemy" was the SPD and not the National Socialists

Re: GBeebies

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2025 6:51 pm
by davidjay
It may have been on here that someone said considering the amount of anti-European media we had for decades prior to the referendum, the real surprise was that the result was so close. In the same way, a Fascist government is long overdue.

Re: GBeebies

Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2025 11:13 am
by Tubby Isaacs
Sorry we wrongly said you'd been to prison, Mrs Markell.

This is the organization that the modern Conservative Party prefers to the BBC.

https://pressgazette.co.uk/the-wire/new ... son-claim/

Re: GBeebies

Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2025 5:15 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
Mendacious fuckwits.

Re: GBeebies

Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2025 9:52 pm
by satnav
I would love it if Doria sued GB News for a couple of Billion and sent the channel into liquidation. That would be my idea of karma.