Page 105 of 105
Re: Labour, generally.
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2026 4:26 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
Pour encourager les autres?
Re: Labour, generally.
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2026 4:44 pm
by Abernathy
Not with you, Malc.
Re: Labour, generally.
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2026 4:57 pm
by Abernathy
Christ. It gets worse.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx ... H8bzU5tD1A
Faisal Islam: Mandelson, Darling and the conversation I can't forget
Re: Labour, generally.
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2026 5:01 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
Abernathy wrote: ↑Mon Feb 02, 2026 4:44 pm
Not with you, Malc.
Voltaire: 'Dans ce pays-ci, il est bon de tuer de temps en temps un amiral pour encourager les autres (In this country, it is good to kill an admiral from time to time to encourage the others)'.
Candide
Re: Labour, generally.
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2026 5:18 pm
by kreuzberger
Nail him to the fucking wall.
Thank you for attention to this matter.
Re: Labour, generally.
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2026 5:43 pm
by Boiler
This is where Starmer needs to get ahead of Olukemi and Derry Street pronto and see if there's a case now for a criminal prosecution - because Labour's enemies are sharpening their knives.
Starmer has, to his credit, already suggested he loses his peerage but I suspect a LOT of damage has been done.
Re: Labour, generally.
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2026 6:02 pm
by Boiler
Emails released by the US government suggest that Lord Mandelson gave Epstein advance notice of a €500bn bailout from the EU to save the Euro.
In the early hours of 10 May 2010 EU finance ministers agreed the deal amid concerns that a debt crisis in the Greek economy could spread to the wider Eurozone.
The evening before the announcement, Epstein emailed Mandelson to say: "sources tell me 500 b euro bailout , almost complete".
The released documents indicate that Mandelson, who was business secretary and de facto deputy prime minister, replied: "Sd be announced tonight."
Epstein then asked if Mandelson was home and received a reply, saying: "Just leaving No10..will call ".
Can it get any worse?
Re: Labour, generally.
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2026 6:28 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Not really.
Re: Labour, generally.
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2026 6:38 pm
by The Weeping Angel
Re: Labour, generally.
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2026 7:09 pm
by Abernathy
I wonder whether Mandy thought he’d be secure in his new ambassadorial job because he thought that Trump would never release the evidence from the Epstein files ? I’m guessing he did. Hubris.
This. Is. Fucking. Appalling. Prosecute.
Re: Labour, generally.
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2026 7:28 pm
by Spoonman
Abernathy wrote: ↑Mon Feb 02, 2026 7:09 pm
This. Is. Fucking. Appalling. Prosecute.
Well Reform and the SNP seem to think it's worth so...
Mandelson reported to police by SNP and Reform after files suggest he sent government information to Epstein
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/clynp40ekrdt
...I'd suggest both parties (especially Reform) must be thinking that any other salacious details from any other released Epstein files won't affect them, otherwise there'd be a shitshow.
Re: Labour, generally.
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2026 7:58 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
I think this is going to be very hard to prosecute, sadly. He’ll just say his sources were unrelated to anything he heard in Government. He was an ex-EU Commissioner. How does anyone prove that this was Government information?
I say sadly because this is going to look like a massive cover up if he’s not prosecuted. And it’ll look even worse for Starmer that he’s the ex-DPP.
Re: Labour, generally.
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2026 8:07 pm
by The Weeping Angel
Do you think he will be forced out over this?