Page 124 of 124

Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2026 8:25 pm
by Bones McCoy
People who like war should be made to smoke a whole packet.

US aircraft "should stop in the first safe country".

Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2026 9:29 pm
by Oboogie
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 7:40 pm Autocutie on Sky News almost wetting herself over Trump saying Starmer 'isn't Churchill'. Palpable glee.
Of course Starmer isn't Churchill, we don't need a Churchill, we're not at war.

Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2026 10:32 pm
by Spoonman
Oboogie wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 9:29 pm
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 7:40 pm Autocutie on Sky News almost wetting herself over Trump saying Starmer 'isn't Churchill'. Palpable glee.
Of course Starmer isn't Churchill, we don't need a Churchill, we're not at war.
Won't happen 'cos he's diplomatic, but I'd love to see Starmer reply along the lines of "Well I'm not exactly dealing with FDR or JFK myself".

Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2026 10:41 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
The Weeping Angel wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 7:46 pm
Public opinion seems to be on Starmer's side.

Only on the second question.

I can't believe those figures for the first question. Are people really saying Britain should just sit there and wait for more attacks?

Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2026 11:04 pm
by Oboogie
Spoonman wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 10:32 pm
Oboogie wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 9:29 pm
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 7:40 pm Autocutie on Sky News almost wetting herself over Trump saying Starmer 'isn't Churchill'. Palpable glee.
Of course Starmer isn't Churchill, we don't need a Churchill, we're not at war.
Won't happen 'cos he's diplomatic, but I'd love to see Starmer reply along the lines of "Well I'm not exactly dealing with FDR or JFK myself".
He isn't even dealing with Nixon!

Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2026 11:12 pm
by davidjay
Oboogie wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 11:04 pm
Spoonman wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 10:32 pm
Oboogie wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 9:29 pm

Of course Starmer isn't Churchill, we don't need a Churchill, we're not at war.
Won't happen 'cos he's diplomatic, but I'd love to see Starmer reply along the lines of "Well I'm not exactly dealing with FDR or JFK myself".
He isn't even dealing with Nixon!
He's possibly dealing with Gerald Ford.