Mailwatch(ed) Forum

Yeah, I think they realised as much. Which is why they withdrew it. But they did say it.

Abernathy wrote: ↑Mon Jan 26, 2026 5:01 pm Yeah, I think they realised as much. Which is why they withdrew it. But they did say it.

So imagine what they say about ordinary folk who are wrestling with workplace or battlefield induced stress.

Abernathy wrote: ↑Mon Jan 26, 2026 5:01 pm Yeah, I think they realised as much. Which is why they withdrew it. But they did say it.

Apparently, they released that statement "in error".

Schrodinger's Dickhead in action again.

It's very Trumpian, isn't it?

Boiler wrote: ↑Mon Jan 26, 2026 5:31 pm It's very Trumpian, isn't it?

And Cruella knows what they were always saying behind her back.

Youngian wrote: ↑Mon Jan 26, 2026 5:00 pm

Conservatives did all we could to look after Suella’s mental health

That's very low rent and unnecessary.

Oh, I dunno...

Youngian wrote: ↑Mon Jan 26, 2026 3:18 pm

Malcolm Armsteen wrote: ↑Mon Jan 26, 2026 12:28 pm Oh dear, how sad etc. etc.

If they keep this up and get a grownup in for Badenoch the Tories will be flirting with electability.

Suella effing off is a good first day for their new project.

Conservative politicians Sir Andy Street and Baroness Ruth Davidson are launching a new movement that will attempt to attract millions of "politically homeless" voters to the Tory party.
their research suggested that seven million people who describe themselves as centrist, or centre-right, felt no party currently represented them.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c93v7nnk3vlo

Aren't they politically homeless because of the Tory party?

Boiler wrote: ↑Mon Jan 26, 2026 2:23 pm

mattomac wrote: ↑Mon Jan 26, 2026 1:22 pm then again I am not going vote for fascism or fascism light.

Come the next GE, do I simply not vote or do I vote for Hayes to keep Reform out?

I dunno, hopefully my next move still gives me the offer of the lesser evil in Lib Dems which it does here.