User avatar
By Watchman
#50698
It must be due to the summer recess, or non-entity backbenchers have been instructed, but my MP seems to be doing a round of “flower festivals and dog shows”, to try and get a bit of “positive” coverage. Although its her day to day level of usefulness anyway
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#50712
Tell me again about the rigorous checks you did on the Bibby before putting asylum seekers on it...

User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#50718
And cue the government saying "Look, we evacuated the barge!" as "proof" of their compassion.
User avatar
By Crabcakes
#50722
Civil servant: Home Secretary, I’m afraid if the barge remains untenable we’ll have to move the proposed residents elsewhere.

Braverman: I see. Yes, I can see we will have to move lots of asylum seekers to another, temporary site. Gather them all in one convenient, hard to escape place.

CS: But Home Secretary, that could put them at high risk of attack, or disease outbreak…

Braverman: <looks dreamily off into the middle distance> Yes. All in one remote place with simple portakabins, far away from scrutiny. Or to put it another way, concentrate them, somehow. In some sort of camp.

Yes, that has a nice ring to it.
User avatar
By Abernathy
#50737
Abernathy wrote: Wed Dec 21, 2022 10:31 pm And especially, ESPECIALLY, Stephen fucking Barclay, the total, utter cunt that he is. I want him boiled in fucking oil.
Eight months on, and I still wish painful harm on this utter fucking wankstain. He keeps popping up on the news brainfarting about “a fair and final offer”. I want to punch his chubby shiny face to a bloody pulp.
User avatar
By Boiler
#50740
On the forum I alluded to earlier, that remark would have got you in trouble according to rule 7.4 - "A contribution must not [...] promote violence"

(even though Barclay deserves it)

How the hell the ones that are discriminatory are deemed okay then...
User avatar
By Abernathy
#50742
As we discussed at the time, we are fortunate that Mailwatch has no such prissy rules.
Boiler, Watchman liked this
User avatar
By Watchman
#50750
At least they’ve managed to stop one boat
mattomac liked this
User avatar
By Abernathy
#50753
A Facebook friend has observed that the government is attempting to deal with migrants crossing the channel in dangerous boats . . . by putting them on a dangerous boat.
User avatar
By Boiler
#50772
With the news of the lives of six more souls at sea today, the Brains Trust that is the Daily Mail commentariat are out in full force - and I'd remind you, the comments there are now moderated:

Screenshot 2023-08-12 at 15-22-56 Six migrants dead after Channel boat capsizes.png
Screenshot 2023-08-12 at 15-22-56 Six migrants dead after Channel boat capsizes.png (28.66 KiB) Viewed 5775 times

"Time to scrap Maritime Law..." dear God, can they walk and chew gum at the same time?
By davidjay
#50780
We have to accept that the initial reaction of many of our fellow countrymen will have been, "It's not a lot, but it's a start."
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#50784
A point made to me by a member of the border security forces when a hapless asylum seeker was killed by a train in the Channel Tunnel...
User avatar
By Boiler
#50786
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 7:55 pm A point made to me by a member of the border security forces when a hapless asylum seeker was killed by a train in the Channel Tunnel...
I once met someone who worked for Border Force who dealt with deportations. It could have been the same person that you met, but his views were strikingly similar...
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#50787
This was a woman. A very unpleasant woman...
  • 1
  • 136
  • 137
  • 138
  • 139
  • 140
  • 280
Byline Times

No, it's barking from beginning to end. A big[…]

Reform Party

I never liked Rod Stewart, long before I knew anyt[…]

Keir Starmer

If everyone ignored them they'd go away.

Liz "Fucking" Jones

Her diary is one of the highlights of the weekend.[…]