Page 16 of 23
Re: Katherine Birbalsingh
Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2023 12:51 am
by davidjay
It's not so much having friends as no-one, so far as I can see, has ever been found or has stood up to say what a great school it was for them and how it changed their life, which is a bit strange given how often she says she empowers disadvantaged children. .
Re: Katherine Birbalsingh
Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2023 8:56 am
by Watchman
She’s so thin skinned all ex-pupils probably have to sign NDA’s
Re: Katherine Birbalsingh
Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2023 3:16 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
davidjay wrote: ↑Sun Jul 16, 2023 12:51 am
It's not so much having friends as no-one, so far as I can see, has ever been found or has stood up to say what a great school it was for them and how it changed their life, which is a bit strange given how often she says she empowers disadvantaged children. .
This isn't the sort of thing 16 year olds are inclined to do, and if they were, they'd probably think in terms of their teachers rather than the headteacher. But the Progress 8 is real enough, even with the advantages that the school has. James Ball rather mucked up his article by not mentioning it at all.
As I say, the big problems I have with Michaela is the pretense that all schools can be like that if only every school was run by a Birbalsingh. It's success depends on their being other schools to take pupils who it wouldn't suit. And I don't like the curriculum- see Warwick Mansell's thread. I asked various Twitter supporters of hers if their kids went to schools like that.
Re: Katherine Birbalsingh
Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2023 3:23 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Re: Katherine Birbalsingh
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2023 5:47 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Re: Katherine Birbalsingh
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2023 6:13 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
Head teacher encourages law breaking and civil disobedience.
Ofsted?
Re: Katherine Birbalsingh
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2023 10:32 pm
by MisterMuncher
Come, come Malcolm. Surely you're aware that it's only completely arbitrary and vindictive rules that she's made up that must be strictly obeyed by those without any hope of a fair fight?
Everything outside of that is completely up for grabs
Re: Katherine Birbalsingh
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2023 10:45 pm
by satnav
I wonder if Birbalsingh allows pupils at her school to pay for their lunches with cash because nearly every secondary school I know only allow prepayment cards in their canteens.
Re: Katherine Birbalsingh
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2023 10:59 pm
by Bones McCoy
satnav wrote: ↑Mon Jul 31, 2023 10:45 pm
I wonder if Birbalsingh allows pupils at her school to pay for their lunches with cash because nearly every secondary school I know only allow prepayment cards in their canteens.
If only somebody had beaten Corbyn P up, and stolen his "lunch money".
Re: Katherine Birbalsingh
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2023 1:43 am
by davidjay
Ms Birbalsingh has explained her apparent double standards by saying that children should obey the rules but adults don't have to.
Re: Katherine Birbalsingh
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2023 9:58 am
by Bones McCoy
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: ↑Mon Jul 31, 2023 6:13 pm
Head teacher encourages law breaking and civil disobedience.
Ofsted?
Strong Freemen of the Land energy there.
But Ofsted have their hands full chasing imaginary cat-people.
Nya

Re: Katherine Birbalsingh
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2023 10:12 am
by Andy McDandy
Well, there's no need to OFSTED our friends, is there?
Re: Katherine Birbalsingh
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2023 11:16 am
by Bones McCoy
Andy McDandy wrote: ↑Tue Aug 01, 2023 10:12 am
Well, there's no need to OFSTED our friends, is there?
Nor audit, nor investigate electoral irregularities, nor apply broadcasting regulations...
We are heading in the direction of the Saxon/Norman laws.
Re: Katherine Birbalsingh
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2023 10:41 pm
by mattomac
For bigger shops they should still offer this service, smaller organisations will probably probably retain more, I know our subs suddenly shot up at football it’s also no longer a hassle to keep the money around.
Re: Katherine Birbalsingh
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2023 10:44 am
by Youngian
The point about Aldi is you know all frills and customer services are stripped to bare minimum in order to discount. Lots of people use cash and most supermarkets will continue to provide the service.
Re: Katherine Birbalsingh
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2023 8:26 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Today's culture war bollocks. Kids can't read because they're doing yoga.
Precisely how much time in school is spent on yoga? I can remember my primary school having some kids who weren't great at reading. They got some extra help, but what was the school supposed to do? Turf them out of art and PE lessons to do more reading? Or should the whole school give up PE and art to do more reading?
Re: Katherine Birbalsingh
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2023 8:35 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
I was under the impression that (minimum) time for maths & literacy was set by the DfE and inspected by Ofsted.
Re: Katherine Birbalsingh
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2023 9:01 pm
by MisterMuncher
Realistically, if a child is having significant difficulty in meeting literacy and numeracy targets under regular classroom instruction, it's an underlying social or educational needs issue. Snuffy here insulates herself from that by running a school that uses PR to create de facto academic selection.
Now, I can't hope to pin down if her stories and attitudes are down to real or affected ignorance, or if her motives are down to culture warring or a simple arrogance that she's better than all those other lazy, stupid teachers, parents and pupils, but I'm pretty sure where I think it stems from.
Re: Katherine Birbalsingh
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2023 9:11 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
I hadn't noticed the reference to gardening there.
I'd have thought her base regarded that as a good thing to do at school. Outdoors, practical, ties in with stuff they do in biology (or as they call it at her school, combined science) etc. She's suggesting that's now stopped for kids who can't read very well?
Re: Katherine Birbalsingh
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2023 9:44 pm
by Yug
I don't think she's suggesting anything of the sort. She's just making shit up which she thinks will appeal to her fans and earn her the praise she so obviously craves.
She's coming across to me as a vain and stupid person who has been elevated way beyond her capabilities. I predict that when her supporters in government are sitting on the Opposition benches (those who managed to retain their seats) she will rapidly fade into the background noise, and eventually disappear from the public stage altogether.