Mailwatch(ed) Forum

Oboogie wrote: ↑Sat Sep 13, 2025 7:15 pm ...back to the discos then. Thanks.

My plaice or yours?

Fish* Discos

* I'm as aware as you pedants that a prawn is not a fish but, no matter how much you grizzle, I'm claiming comedic licence. It's a fucking sea creature and that's close enough.

I'm seeing this sentiment quite a lot on Bluesky.



Their anger isn't so much at the yobs but at Ministers who say what they want to say.

Suggesting the condemnation of violent racists and the incitement of billionaire Nazis is hardly sitting on the fence.

I might be wrong, but I would suggest that a lot of people voted for Starmer not merely because he wasn't a tory, but because they liked the cut of his jib - a decent man who best articulated everyone else's frustrations/disgust/anger when he was on the front foot.

The Weeping Angel wrote: ↑Sat Sep 13, 2025 9:28 pm I'm seeing this sentiment quite a lot on Bluesky.



Their anger isn't so much at the yobs but at Ministers who say what they want to say.

When has a government ever commented on a Saturday afternoon demo? Apart from the ludicrous Braverman whose shit stirring resulted in a punch up with the police at the Cenotaph and cost her job.

Youngian wrote: ↑Sat Sep 13, 2025 10:24 pm

The Weeping Angel wrote: ↑Sat Sep 13, 2025 9:28 pm I'm seeing this sentiment quite a lot on Bluesky.



Their anger isn't so much at the yobs but at Ministers who say what they want to say.

When has a government ever commented on a Saturday afternoon demo? Apart from the ludicrous Braverman whose shit stirring resulted in a punch up with the police at the Cenotaph and cost her job.

Here's what Shabana Mahmood had to say.

Why is Mahmood stating the bleedin obvious?

It's not that different from what Ed Davey had to say.

It's not different from what Ed Davey had to say.