Mailwatch(ed) Forum

The Weeping Angel wrote: ↑Sat May 03, 2025 5:27 pm The argument is that Starmer should have told people this and gone in more forcefully on this issue.

I think lots of people know this about Farage though, same as they knew the stuff about Trump. A general election with Reform as the challenger would obviously look different to local elections with them as the plucky outsider, but I think there might be limited capacity for hits.

Does Debra Kidd know that Australia under Albanese are doing worse than the stuff Yvette Cooper gets criticism for? As Ian said, they weren't getting killed on stopping boats because boats had already been stopped.

Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 2:54 pm Does Debra Kidd know that Australia under Albanese are doing worse than the stuff Yvette Cooper gets criticism for? As Ian said, they weren't getting killed on stopping boats because boats had already been stopped.

What exactly are they doing?

This is what Tony Abbott introduced. My impression is that turn backs, very controversial, are still happening.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation ... gn_Borders

Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 5:56 pm This is what Tony Abbott introduced. My impression is that turn backs, very controversial, are still happening.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation ... gn_Borders

If the government did that, the outrage in online left/liberal circles would be off the scale.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-67609963

The Australian government says it will halve the migration intake within two years in an attempt to fix the country's "broken" immigration system.

It aims to slash the annual intake to 250,000 - roughly in line with pre-pandemic levels - by June 2025.

Visa rules for international students and low-skilled workers will also be tightened under the new plan.

Migration has climbed to record levels in Australia, adding pressure to housing and infrastructure woes.

But there remains a shortage of skilled workers, and the country struggles to attract them.

Unveiling a new 10-year immigration strategy at a media briefing on Monday, Home Affairs Minister Clare O'Neil said the migration system had been left "in tatters" by the previous government.

A review earlier this year found the system was "badly broken" - unnecessarily complex, slow and inefficient - and in need of "major reform".

A record 510,000 people came to Australia in the year to June 2023, but the minister said her government would "bring numbers back under control" and reduce the annual migration intake by around 50%.

Among the new measures are tougher minimum English-language requirements for international students, and more scrutiny of those applying for a second visa - they must prove that any further study would advance their academic aspirations or their careers. There are some 650,000 foreign students in Australia, with many of them on their second visa, according to official data.

The visa pathways for migrants with "specialist" or "essential" skills - like highly-skilled tech workers or care workers - have also been improved to offer better prospects of permanent residency.

Yeah, if Labour proposed something like this, then all those people saying why can't Labour be more like Labor would not be happy.

The Weeping Angel wrote: ↑Mon May 05, 2025 1:51 pm
Yeah, if Labour proposed something like this, then all those people saying why can't Labour be more like Labor would not be happy.

I hadn't seen that, good spot. In fairness the population of Australia makes those numbers bigger than they would be in a UK context, but you could equally say they're "running scared of Peter Dutton" or whoever. I think some of the Labour rhetoric here has been a bit silly. Nobody seriously think Boris Johnson was running an "experiment in open borders", but most changes seem fairly modest. It doesn't help that there's a large constituency now for high levels of immigration that opposes development.

Terrible news out of Bondi Beach, where gunmen attacked a Hanukkah celebration.

While this is absolutely dreadful, I am also sure Farage is furious that the hero of the hour is a Syrian immigrant.

Also, when people start saying globalize the intifada, perhaps they could take a minute and think about what that actually looks like.

Even Netanyahu hasn't hurled himself in to that black hole of semantics.

He, and his cheerleaders of the right, are merely cloaking themselves in the absurdity of recognising Palestine being the root cause of murderous outrage.

What absolute tosh.

Well, yeah, this is what globalizing the intifada looks like. Here's what Daniel Finkelstein says on the matter. Column linked in Daniel Sugarman's post.

https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/a-short-gu ... -security/

Last weekend, a family member of mine sang in a Christmas concert which took place in a local Methodist church. It had been advertised several months in advance, and my relatives and I went along, walked through the open doors and that was it – we were in.

I recently went to my local synagogue. There were three security guards outside – one an employee of the shul, two members of the congregation whose turn on the rota it was to stand watch that day. They let me through the outer gate. Then a different member of the synagogue, watching the CCTV camera based just inside the synagogue, opened the inner door for me.

I’m not sure whether non-Jewish people entirely understand the high levels of security that so many Jewish communities operate with as a matter of course. Perhaps one reason for that lack of understanding is that we don’t speak about it a great deal. It’s just there – a part of life. Many synagogues have this sort of set up – which is why the terror attack on Heaton Park synagogue in Manchester didn’t cost more lives. Synagogues around the country have been trained by the Community Security Trust for exactly this sort of attack. As many people said in October, it was not seen as a case of if such an attack would happen, but when.

Another example, if I may.

Many Jewish events – in the UK and elsewhere – are organised as follows. You sign up, but aren’t told where the event will take place until 24 hours before. The reason is simple, but simultaneously horrifying. It is to provide as little time as possible for would-be terrorists to scope out the venue and plan an attack.