Mailwatch(ed) Forum

Don't wish to worry you, but the Chancellor is on to "don't listen to the doomsayers".

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... ts-britain

Of interest here is she still blames a "chaotic Brexit". I'd be happier if she said "Brexit".

Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Tue Oct 28, 2025 10:29 pm Don't wish to worry you, but the Chancellor is on to "don't listen to the doomsayers".

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... ts-britain

Of interest here is she still blames a "chaotic Brexit". I'd be happier if she said "Brexit".

The article isn't that bad, although perhaps don't listen to those who helped cause this mess would have been better. Meanwhile,



The I told us yesterday it was going to get watered down.

There might be a case for watering down day one protection, as it goes. You get cases where people know very quickly that things aren't going to work. Perhaps a month or so? Are employers really going to keep churning staff every month? It's not like unemployment is at early 80s levels, where they can do that and then have their pick of people with very good employment records. Actually, perhaps there's something like this in it already, I don't know.

Reeves does a decent job rousing the troops there, I was being playful. She once again says "this isn't austerity", but that won't stop lots of people on the left lying about it.

Epping sex offender Hadush Kebatu deported to Ethiopia, Home Office confirms
Kebatu, who was wrongly freed from Essex prison, was put on a flight to Ethiopia and arrived on Wednesday

GB News got a video out of David Lammy not confirming he'd be "on the next flight". So he went within 3 days. Doubtless they'll flag this up to their viewers.

Quite incredible that they're still going with this stuff. Nothing better for an Opposition Day? Not very many turned up for it.

Nick Thomas-Symonds duly smashes the ball out of the park.

Talking of China.

Nice sighting of a mostly unlamented Labour politician.

Lord Hutton, a Labour peer and former defence secretary, says the joint committee has not heard any evidence that politicians interferred with the CPS decisions in this case.

But he says he is worried about “complacency” in government. He says he is worried that the “inherent reticence on the part of government to really call out the dangerous nature of Chinese espionage activity” could lead to other alleged spies not being prosecuted in future.

Hermer disputes this. He says the new legislation will make it possible to prosecute allege spies. He goes on:

We now have legislation that is fit for purpose, and we will use that legislation whenever there’s credible evidence that people are seeking to damage the national interest of this country.

Isn't that the whole point of the new legislation? Well done for feeding lines to the Opposition. Being diplomatic in public doesn't meany you're "complacent".

Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Wed Oct 29, 2025 9:47 am There might be a case for watering down day one protection, as it goes. You get cases where people know very quickly that things aren't going to work. Perhaps a month or so? Are employers really going to keep churning staff every month? It's not like unemployment is at early 80s levels, where they can do that and then have their pick of people with very good employment records. Actually, perhaps there's something like this in it already, I don't know.

Reeves does a decent job rousing the troops there, I was being playful. She once again says "this isn't austerity", but that won't stop lots of people on the left lying about it.

Edit- I got this wrong. Perfectly possible to dismiss. The protection is against unfair dismissal.