Mailwatch(ed) Forum

Here's another candidate for government funding now. Obviously, a democracy can't just whistle up this sort of money, but it should be able to find something. But you know, just fix decades of underfunding of the legal system now, or something.

Here's something else which should be in the budget. Again, I'd struggle to see this as a lesser priority than the courts service.

The two child benefit cap is to be abolished in full, according to The Times. Sparking such responses like this on X.

How many kids does he think “they” have these days?

Too many, apparently.



Fucking hell, this has brought out all the racists.

I've got 3 kids, am I now an ethnic minority?

Malcolm Armsteen wrote: ↑Sun Nov 23, 2025 2:26 pm I've got 3 kids, am I now an ethnic minority?

You're white and English. Definitely an ethnic minority.

If you don't believe me just ask tommeh ten-names.

Yug wrote: ↑Sun Nov 23, 2025 2:30 pm

Malcolm Armsteen wrote: ↑Sun Nov 23, 2025 2:26 pm I've got 3 kids, am I now an ethnic minority?

You're white and English. Definitely an ethnic minority.

If you don't believe me just ask tommeh ten-names.

Yes, I'm feeling all oppressed.

Mostly by fucking superglue, but that's another story...

'They breed like rabbits' was an Alf Garnett cliche 60 years ago. And white racists like child benefit payments. Suggest a woman should have a contraceptive implant in order to receive a generous benefit for a first child they go quiet on the subject.

I thought they wanted more children? I wish they'd make their minds up.

davidjay wrote: ↑Sun Nov 23, 2025 4:28 pm I thought they wanted more children? I wish they'd make their minds up.

Here Nigel Farage takes the opposite view to Nigel Farage who's been telling us for over two decades that "we're full up."
This contradiction would make sense if you were a white supremist like Nazi schoolboy Nigel Farage. But not adult Nigel Farage who isn't a fascist, oh no.

In a recent speech, Farage outlined proposals that include tax incentives for married couples and the removal of the two-child benefit cap. He emphasized that these measures are designed to ease the financial burden on families and encourage population growth https://care.org.uk/news/2025/05/nigel- ... irth-rates

They're also going to freeze rail fares as well.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwygx71g3n7o

Rail fares in England are to be frozen next year for the first time in 30 years, the government has announced.

The freeze until March 2027 will apply to regulated fares, which includes season tickets and off-peak returns.

The most recent fare rise, in March 2025, was 4.6%. Rail fares traditionally have gone up in January, based on the July rate of the retail price index (RPI) + 1% - although this formula has not always been followed.

The announcement comes days before the chancellor sets out the government's financial plans in the Budget on Wednesday, with Rachel Reeves indicating that cutting the cost of living will be a key focus.

However, at the same time the chancellor is also widely expected to increase taxes to help fill a multibillion-pound gap in her spending plans.

Red Tory bastards.

Stephen Bush isn't as clever as he thinks he is. Assume he's talking about tax. Unless he knows something we don't, the promise not to raise employee NI, income tax, VAT and Corporation Tax rates is still holding. Never mind all the other stuff that is being delivered.

Now, sure, you can say the way they've got round that has been suboptimal on eg employers' NI, and freezing thresholds. But that's not the same thing as saying it was undeliverable and fell apart immediately. And it's not like they're the first government to do this stuff. I get why they hate the illiberalism of the government, but there's something more in the hostility towards this government from the (non rabid right) media. Like they hate them for not being as clever as them or something.

These tax rises this year seem to have come from the OBR having given Hunt the benefit of the doubt on productivity, but no Reeves. Or does Bush think they've come about because Reeves structured some tax rises wrong?

The Weeping Angel wrote: ↑Sun Nov 23, 2025 6:21 pm

Red Tory bastards.

Be interesting to see the budgeting for this. Do they see the new structure saving money? Probably a bit early for that, though it would be nice if they could show some improvement like this. Or is it paid for by less investment? Which would be less positive.

Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Sun Nov 23, 2025 7:37 pm Stephen Bush isn't as clever as he thinks he is. Assume he's talking about tax. Unless he knows something we don't, the promise not to raise employee NI, income tax, VAT and Corporation Tax rates is still holding. Never mind all the other stuff that is being delivered.

Now, sure, you can say the way they've got round that has been suboptimal on eg employers' NI, and freezing thresholds. But that's not the same thing as saying it was undeliverable and fell apart immediately. And it's not like they're the first government to do this stuff. I get why they hate the illiberalism of the government, but there's something more in the hostility towards this government from the (non rabid right) media. Like they hate them for not being as clever as them or something.

These tax rises this year seem to have come from the OBR having given Hunt the benefit of the doubt on productivity, but no Reeves. Or does Bush think they've come about because Reeves structured some tax rises wrong?

I'm not sure why either. I don't remember Bush being as vitrolic about Johnson for instance.

Reasons to be cheerful

Advice for the Government from David Cameron's sister in law. Don't do any policies that help people, unless they're destitute (and I'm not sure about her commitment then). She argues this is why taxes on families are going up. It's a redistribution from people like me with no kids to people who have kids. And I'm pretty cool with that.

A lot of the responses to that video were along those lines here's one from Janice Turner,

She knows better what Breakfast Clubs are for than the people setting them up, does she?

They're just annoyed they can't moan about all the benefits going to "scroungers". Isn't the point that even if you just want a bit of time to yourself in the morning, breakfast clubs are for you as well?