User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#100209
The full thing on the NHS reforms is worth reading.

https://www.instituteforgovernment.org. ... s/overview

They're certainly right about chaotic announcements. But they do allow that there is a lot of duplication, confused accountability, and there should be much less of that without NHS England, with a much clearer structure. One of the points made is that the improvements may not be felt before the next election. Perhaps this is the Government has underestimated the speed they'll work, or perhaps this is a genuine long term change that will pay off, of the sort that people say they want politicians to do.

And there's this.
As a further indication of how poorly planned this NHS reorganisation has been, a row has broken out between NHSE and the government over the money required to pay ICB staff’s redundancy packages. Rachel Reeves reportedly refused Wes Streeting’s request to provide the NHS with £1.3 billion (bn) of additional funding to cover that cost.30
As a result, ICBs are reporting that they will not be able to lay off staff in this financial year, given existing allocations.31 That has left systems in suspended animation, unable to go ahead with reforms and with staff having little motivation or incentive to deliver the government’s agenda while there is so much uncertainty over their own roles.
Is that bad planning or is that the Health Secretary trying to get more money out of the Chancellor? Presumably there's some middle ground between no redundancies now and 12,500. The Chancellor and Chief Secretary are within their rights, I'd say, to argue that health has had a lot more money than other areas (and did under Johnson-Sunak) so perhaps it could organize better. Easy to say from here, of course.
By mattomac
#100217
Problem with any kind of reform like this is Chris Phillip turns around and says “we would turn it around in a week”

Like they didn’t in 14 years of mostly dacronian Home Secretaries but that’s the position you take.

There are some quite obvious things that you’d expect but they are framed in an absolutely stupid tone, such as Asylum seekers should be expected to work. Oh really how do they do that currently? With all the crap blocking it.

Welcomed that she mentioned more safe routes mind. Probably the carrot in the shit. Should be at least two review stages as standard.

Does feel a bit like “well we’ve had our Hitler” type bollocks and climate change is fundamentally going to change all this anyhow and governments seem short sighted on that.
User avatar
By Boiler
#100221
Also, what's this about?

Digital IDs will be compulsory for right-to-work checks, which will be extended to self-employed and sub-contracted workers, and those in the gig economy
Does that include folk like myself?
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#100222
Reselling tickets for profit to be outlawed in UK government crackdown

Touts – and ordinary consumers – will no longer be able to charge anything more than price at which they purchased ticket
This sounds almost too good to be true. Is it enforceable like this? I don't mean old school touts with black eyes hanging out round the Astoria, I mean industrial online selling. If it's possible, why hasn't it happened before?

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2025/ ... -crackdown
  • 1
  • 212
  • 213
  • 214
  • 215
  • 216
Trump 2.0 Lunacy

The Republicans in the House were going to vote en[…]

Labour Government 2024 - ?

Warren's doing his best. https://bsky.app/pr[…]

Your Party

I've for the very first time used an AI pic[…]

Farage's Flagwankers

Well, the whole enterprise never was the spontaneo[…]