I thought that Reeves played an absolute blinder, today. She left the tories and sundry other critics gasping like haddock on a trawler deck.
"Embattled", my arse.
Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Wed Nov 26, 2025 5:07 pm Fuck off, Ed Davey.Although I had precious little time to read it today, I did note that it was refreshing not to have the usual whining about rejoining the EU BTL in the Guardian, nor the accusations towards those who voted remain but would now vote to leave it of being liars, as though you can't change your mind in the light of events.
They're negotiating with the EU right now, as you well know. Growth is second in the G7.
This was a botched budget delivered by a chancellor who has diagnosed the disease, but refuses to administer the cure.
This government has chosen to reject the single biggest thing it could do to turbocharge economic growth and repair the £90bn Brexit black hole.
Labour was elected on a promise of tackling the cost of living crisis and growing the economy - and this is the second budget where it’s failed to do either. For millions of people struggling with higher bills, all this budget really offers is higher taxes.
kreuzberger wrote: ↑Wed Nov 26, 2025 7:28 pm I thought that Reeves played an absolute blinder, today. She left the tories and sundry other critics gasping like haddock on a trawler deck.The girl certainly did dun good
"Embattled", my arse.
kreuzberger wrote: ↑Wed Nov 26, 2025 7:28 pm I thought that Reeves played an absolute blinder, today. She left the tories and sundry other critics gasping like haddock on a trawler deck.Covering her arse, according to the Guardian... raising taxes to pay for u-turns...
"Embattled", my arse.
Rachel Reeves targets UK’s wealthiest in £26bn tax-raising budgetWhat's going on at The Guardian? A strangely positive headline. By tomorrow they'll be on to the usual "massive missed opportunity for the radical change everyone wants" or something about the government "refusing to rule out"slaughter of the first born.
Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Wed Nov 26, 2025 10:28 pmDon't worry, the Mail are making up for it.Rachel Reeves targets UK’s wealthiest in £26bn tax-raising budgetWhat's going on at The Guardian? A strangely positive headline. By tomorrow they'll be on to the usual "massive missed opportunity for the radical change everyone wants" or something about the government "refusing to rule out"slaughter of the first born.
In fairness Heather Stewart is pretty fair, and this is one of her big days.
The OVfM has put forward serious proposals for better spendingNot very exciting, but sometimes the answer is "more bureaucrats" in some areas. I don't know how well integrated into the health reforms they are, mind.
Slipped out alongside today’s big announcements on tax are a series welcome reforms to the spending framework.
These include:
10-year projections for efficiencies to help “enable a focus on long-term value for money”, with projections set out for four policy areas and a proposed methodology for estimating efficiencies which could be applied more widely.
Improvements to the spending controls and accountability framework, to help streamline decision-making and improve delivery.
The four topics for the first round of programme thematic value for money reviews, as first announced at the IfG in January. These are: new models of care in the NHS and communities, youth provision, funding and delivery models for homelessness services and maintenance of public assets.
These recommendations come from the Office for Value for Money, the internal Treasury unit established last autumn.
If done well, these reforms could deliver serious improvements to how government spends taxpayers' money.
£100,000 earner upset about reduction in ISA limitYou know it's not an instant Kwarteng.