User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#99694
Andy McDandy wrote: Tue Nov 11, 2025 1:22 pm Education's an odd one. Going by coverage in the media, what people want is good schools and nice universities for their kids, and when it comes to the curriculum, 'not this'.

Vocational courses, apprenticeships, academic rigour, compulsory sport for everyone, must be competitive, not inclusive, traditional material, relevant to the modern world, transferable skills, fronted fucking adverbials, phonics, 3 Rs, SEN for my kids because not all learning issues are obvious, that kid on the other hand is just bone idle and thick.
Indeed. Though looking on the bright side, have we got past "mixed school for my son, single sex for my daughter"?
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#99863
Aditya Chakraborty has come out with "Bad Starmer, bond markets are in charge", I see.

What do these people actually want? Increasingly there's a strand of comment and left think tankery that seems to be about getting tropes in rather than solving problems.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#99976
Dark forces are preventing us fighting the climate crisis – by taking knowledge hostage
George Monbiot
Certainly the attack on knowledge is part of the reaction to net zero. But are most European Governments struggling with the transition because they've had seeds of doubt sown by their equivalents of Tufton Street? Surely the big political problem is the cost.

George, as his wont nowadays, shows up with a soundbite BTL that renewables are cheaper. This is misleading when you take back up, grid connections etc into account, as various people point out.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... -173082282
User avatar
By kreuzberger
#101030
It is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore the supposition that Teh Graun is adopting the old business model of their right-wing competitors; praying for a diametrically opposed regime so that it will rile their own base.

These days, that'll amount to feverish clicks on deportation images and videos - ergo; more revenue. Monetising misery.

It'll make a few quid. It's nothing new.

Image
mattomac, Boiler liked this
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#101176
Another sighting of a Guardian hobby horse- the four day week, which the government are being "urged" to consider by a group set up to urge governments to consider the four day week.

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2 ... -and-wales

The argument here is burn out, while saying the same amount of work will be done over four days as five. I don't see how that can work. What time is actually saved here, some commuting time one day a week? That'll be very handy for some teachers, but a virtual irrelevance to lots of others. Can't schools by themselves take this into account already, like any other organization does with its work from home policy? Why does the Government have to get involved, and why does it have to be offered to every teacher? Would it be easy to timetable anyway?
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#101189
It's the work paradox - we're apparently a country of hard working families, yet simultaneously plagued by legions of workshy bastards.

Or to put it another way, I'm a grafter, but I remember to keep work and home life in balance, and have some me time. They're lazy cunts who are always swinging the lead and spending time on their fantasy football.

I guess the real issue is that our culture says you need money to live, and the only way of making enough money is to work as much as possible - up to the point you pass through the glass sphincter and you're suddenly an asset and just start raking in money while doing fuck all.
mattomac liked this
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#101199
Yep, that paradox is exactly it. One man's work life balance is another man's never around when you need them. In terms of policy, and the Guardian's interest, I think this is all pretty middle class. Lots of people's reaction to "do you want Friday off?" would be to think they could do with the extra money of working the odd Friday extra. This, I think, is why the policy didn't really land for Corbyn in 2019.

I'm skeptical of this stuff when an in person presence is required. And can you even organize your week where all the marking is done on one day? Would you want to? Wouldn't it be better often to get the work back to them in the next lesson, not next week? Can you teach the next bit without having gone through the last bit properly?

I've some friends (senior City lawyers) who do lots of working from home, but one problem they've run up against is that part of their job is being there for less experienced staff. They've had to make an effort to be in the office more than they would be for exactly this reason. I'd guess teaching was something where a personal touch in person was even more important.
  • 1
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
Your Party

And you just know the government will get roped in[…]

Tulip Siddiq seems to have been penalised for havi[…]

Reform Party

And Lia Nici too. I think the Tories are underr[…]

Guardian

Would it be easy to timetable anyway? No. It[…]