User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#101437
Child Poverty strategy published today.

Let's see how much coverage this gets from people who have told us for years that they care about this stuff. I suspect it'll get a lot of "we wouldn't have child poverty if Starmer taxed the rich/ joined the EU" and the like.
Boiler liked this
User avatar
By Abernathy
#101441
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Fri Dec 05, 2025 10:38 am Child Poverty strategy published today.

Let's see how much coverage this gets from people who have told us for years that they care about this stuff. I suspect it'll get a lot of "we wouldn't have child poverty if Starmer taxed the rich/ joined the EU" and the like.
AKA "Let's look after our own".
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#101445
There'll be that, but I'm talking about people who have professed to care about poverty. Reaction will likely be the same as the reaction to other things they've said they care about- industrial policy, workers rights, the minimum wage, renters rights, green investment, increasing unemployment benefit, more free school meals, recognizing Palestine.. Some will ignore, some will talk about the "real issues". The real issues are anything else they don't like about the government. Fewer jury trials, that's one of the real issues. Striking resident doctors. Anything.
Oboogie liked this
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#101507
A good article on the child poverty strategy here.

https://labourlist.org/2025/12/tories-s ... d-poverty/
Did you hear the words of the leader of the opposition? She said Labour’s budget was a budget for ‘Benefit Street’. It was a flashback returning us to a decade ago. The Tory front bench on the hunt for any opportunity to pour scorn on people they believed were beneath them and ordinary humans being denigrated on the television.

Nothing has changed for the Tories in the 10 years since George Osborne proudly horrified us with his scroungers versus strivers rhetoric. They still think that pouring scorn on those poorer than themselves helps them politically.

But something changed for the rest of us. From then to now, the Tories in office increased child poverty by about one million.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#101525
This might get some cut through if and when energy bills come done. The £150 a month cut (from April) should help, but some of that will be recouped from the income tax threshold being frozen.

Talking of George Osborne, he was by far the most influential Tory Chancellor. So why would straight talking Ed Davey leave him out of this (massive bullshit) meme, eh? It's a mystery, On the plus side, more people seem to be noticing this bullshit from the Lib Dems.

Oboogie liked this
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#101693
Do these people think everyone gets their day in court with a jury now? Maybe they’re responding to the bullshit about “series offences like rape and murder” when it’s way more serious offences than that which will still be tried by jury.

Think it’s unlikely the proposals get defeated, with the weight of Leveson behind them. Plus the Minister, Sarah Sackman, is a KC who knows what she’s talking about.

I keep saying how the government isn’t allowed by almost anyone in the public eye to make any changes at all. The Winter Fuel Allowance was the first clue to that. (There were certainly arguments to keep it, but “pensioners freezing to death” wasn’t one of them).

Restricting Motability so that it doesn’t cover some seriously expensive foreign petrol cars is apparently unthinkable to some. “Trapping the disabled in their homes”.

Tax deductions for £10k bikes survived the Budget, or else that would have been another ridiculous kick off. That this survived a Treasury review makes the Treasury look like a bunch of pals fighting their own corner.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#101697
The Tories must be laughing their arses off at how the bombs they left for Labour are all exploding. SEND is another one, see just one connected issue here, transporting children to school. (I say connected, because it's a wider issue, with only 40% of children having SEND certificates)

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2 ... s-mps-told

People from LAs are clear that lots of these children don't need what they disparagingly call a "door to door taxi service". While a Labour MP points out (absolutely correctly) that support for SEND children is something that parents only get if they fight all the way for it. Can't this be organized better? Say what you like about the Tories, they were capable of making changes, even just at the level of saving money in the short term. They've preferred not to, and will now have a good laugh at Labour trying to do it and getting mauled by everyone as "making changes not even the Tories considered". It depresses me that such people, while often exaggerating what Labour does for partisan reasons, can't see why the Tories didn't consider them. Certain newspapers will inevitably go out of their way to give the impression Labour is smashing the whole thing up even if they end up spending more money on it.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#101703
Good thread here on why surgery waiting lists aren't falling despite improved NHS performance.

I actually like the explanation offered BTL that most people on waiting lists don't actually need surgery. So the quickest way to get a waiting list down is actually to see these people, so they're not actually on the list any more, rather than do the operations etc. We'll see if increased capacity can deliver more of this. But it's sure as heck a long way back from where we are.

  • 1
  • 228
  • 229
  • 230
  • 231
  • 232
Trump 2.0 Lunacy

You never expect much of Republicans, but could th[…]

Labour Government 2024 - ?

Good thread here on why surgery waiting lists aren[…]

The Greens

Fuck off Zack Very progressive to say immigrant[…]

The Daily Torygraph

I don’t think Red Bird is. No but Tel[…]