satnav wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2024 8:50 pm Spotted this on Blusky.That's brutal.
![]()
It reads like one of those American go-fund-me appeals.
Youngian wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2024 9:58 pm I wonder which monarch had the happiest care free reign, Edward VII sounds a good candidate. A constitutional monarch with no mass media to bother him, he ate, drank, hunted, shagged and watched sport a lot.Edward VIII didn't have it too bad. All the drinking and shagging, finally got the job, said "Stuff this for a game of soldiers" first chance he got and shot off somewhere warm.
Youngian wrote: ↑Sat Nov 30, 2024 12:07 pm Joe Average could only dream of a life in a French chateau with a guaranteed generous dole cheque every year but he cut a sad figure. Who backed the wrong horse and should have been grateful he wasn't shot for treason.He'd sold Balmoral and Sandringham to George VI in return for a yearly allowance and still lived with some style. There were overseas trips and he was generally received well by the great and the good.
Don't know much about his daily life from 1945 until his death but guess it wasn't too hard. Was he a minor French celeb opening supermarkets wearing a plastic crown?
Boiler wrote: ↑Sat Jan 03, 2026 1:21 pm Didn't Billy Connolly suggest the theme to The Archers?Yes, he did, but not on the grounds of any sort of critique of the innate inequality or unearned privilege of the monarchy. Billy’s (correct) view was that “God Save the Queen” is just a dismal tune.
Abernathy wrote: ↑Sun Jan 04, 2026 5:58 pm Dimbleby’s documentary series was (unexpectedly) brilliant, and scathing. The answer to the rhetorical question its title proposes has to be, for anyone that watches it, “Fuck knows”.Had to find it via a Google. Its called 'What's the monarchy for? '
I recommend catching it on the Iplayer.
He'll never come across a bandwagon he can[…]