By Youngian
#79671
I wonder which monarch had the happiest care free reign, Edward VII sounds a good candidate. A constitutional monarch with no mass media to bother him, he ate, drank, hunted, shagged and watched sport a lot.
Last edited by Youngian on Sun Nov 24, 2024 10:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
By kreuzberger
#79672
All this carry on about being sent happy and glorious doesn't seem to be going too well.

I'd be tempted to chuck the whole thing as long as I could keep the oatcake business. And the hat, of course. The hat would be a hard red-line.
By davidjay
#80027
Youngian wrote: Sun Nov 24, 2024 9:58 pm I wonder which monarch had the happiest care free reign, Edward VII sounds a good candidate. A constitutional monarch with no mass media to bother him, he ate, drank, hunted, shagged and watched sport a lot.
Edward VIII didn't have it too bad. All the drinking and shagging, finally got the job, said "Stuff this for a game of soldiers" first chance he got and shot off somewhere warm.
By Youngian
#80032
Joe Average could only dream of a life in a French chateau with a guaranteed generous dole cheque every year but he cut a sad figure. Who backed the wrong horse and should have been grateful he wasn't shot for treason.
Don't know much about his daily life from 1945 until his death but guess it wasn't too hard. Was he a minor French celeb opening supermarkets wearing a plastic crown?
By davidjay
#80038
Youngian wrote: Sat Nov 30, 2024 12:07 pm Joe Average could only dream of a life in a French chateau with a guaranteed generous dole cheque every year but he cut a sad figure. Who backed the wrong horse and should have been grateful he wasn't shot for treason.
Don't know much about his daily life from 1945 until his death but guess it wasn't too hard. Was he a minor French celeb opening supermarkets wearing a plastic crown?
He'd sold Balmoral and Sandringham to George VI in return for a yearly allowance and still lived with some style. There were overseas trips and he was generally received well by the great and the good.
User avatar
By AOB
#102893



That's effectively what the subservient submissive Royalists sing, and woe betide anyone who boos it. Too early in the day to think how utterly crazy it is that in 2026 there is even a Royal family who have untold wealth, privileges and sycophants who literally bow to them.
By Youngian
#102901
Explaining to the St George flag shaggers that England needs a national anthem because it doesn't have one like Scotland and Wales is hard work but worth pursuing.
User avatar
By Abernathy
#102904
Boiler wrote: Sat Jan 03, 2026 1:21 pm Didn't Billy Connolly suggest the theme to The Archers?
Yes, he did, but not on the grounds of any sort of critique of the innate inequality or unearned privilege of the monarchy. Billy’s (correct) view was that “God Save the Queen” is just a dismal tune.
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#102978
In the I this weekend, Jennie Bond has a column talking about how the Royal Family is going to be on a charm offensive this year, to banish memories of Prince Diddler of Kiddyfiddler. She talks at length about the recent documentary "What is the RF for?", and highlights their views and work on ecology and sustainability.

All well and good, but not really much of a mission statement. Especially when that's at odds with their conspicuous consumption. Seems to me that if they have a purpose, it's on a level with football team mascots.
User avatar
By Yug
#102986
Bread and circuses innit. They get the bread for being the circus.
User avatar
By Abernathy
#102987
Dimbleby’s documentary series was (unexpectedly) brilliant, and scathing. The answer to the rhetorical question its title proposes has to be, for anyone that watches it, “Fuck knows”.

I recommend catching it on the Iplayer.
User avatar
By Abernathy
#102988
Hard to see how any sort of charm offensive could banish the memory of Andy the kiddy fiddler.
Youngian liked this
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#102990
Here's Nice Kate doing some things, like nobody has ever done things before.
By Youngian
#102994
Abernathy wrote: Sun Jan 04, 2026 5:58 pm Dimbleby’s documentary series was (unexpectedly) brilliant, and scathing. The answer to the rhetorical question its title proposes has to be, for anyone that watches it, “Fuck knows”.

I recommend catching it on the Iplayer.
Had to find it via a Google. Its called 'What's the monarchy for? '
Recall some first rate docs from David Dimbleby. One on the international politics involved in ending white rule in Rhodesia and another on the rise of US global dominance.
  • 1
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
Trump 2.0 Lunacy

Well that Russian hardware did bugger all to sto[…]

He'll never come across a bandwagon he can�[…]

Labour Government 2024 - ?

I see thing's have now moved on to how bad it[…]

Keir Starmer

He's criticized Trump directly on Greenland. […]