#91164
Let it go. It's Dan Hodges and, as any observer of this ridiculous man knows, he's never been right about anything, ever. Besides, why should anyone, anywhere give a shit about what he thinks about anything? I've got a lifetime of experience to draw on, I could run rings around him based on the jobs I've done, the people I've known and the places I've been. So fuck off Dan Hodges.
Last edited by Rosvanian on Fri Jun 20, 2025 11:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Andy McDandy liked this
#91168
I was listening to news earlier when Tammy Gray Thompson was arguing that the Bill was wrong because there were not enough medical professional available to make it viable. I have a lot of time for Tammy Gray Thompson but given that the Bill won't come into effect for 4 years there is plenty of time to get the medics in place. And if the medics are not in place then approval won't be given.
#91169
satnav wrote: Fri Jun 20, 2025 10:54 pm How the hell has Dan Hodges become one of the Mail's chief political correspondent? He really is as thick as pig shit. He churns out crap that is lapped up by Mail readers even if what he writes is utter bollocks.
QED
#91171
The Weeping Angel wrote: Fri Jun 20, 2025 8:11 pm I remember when this person claimed Kim was only elected because Jo Cox was murdered.
Well, technically, that is true, as Kim herself readily acknowledges. But she wasn’t even trying to become an MP until her sister Jo was murdered.
#91172
By one of the coincidences that make our world such an interesting place my mum finally slipped away a few hours after the vote. Anyone who voted against it should have had to spend the last few months visiting her. She was thankfully peaceful over the past few days but before that we had months of mental torture for her and a lot of angst for those of us who saw her fading.
Last edited by davidjay on Sat Jun 21, 2025 1:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
#91177
My condolences, David.
I hope you can now find peace and closure, and your memories of her will be from before her illness.

In my thoughts.
#91189
davidjay wrote: Sat Jun 21, 2025 12:35 pm Thank you all. I'm now pondering whether the extra weeks of her anguish were worth having if they meant her going peacefully when her time really had come.
One of those thoughts that inevitably comes to mind in these, very particular, circumstances. Though I clearly cannot possibly know, I would venture that from your Mum’s point of view, the answer to that question is almost certainly no.

Only you can say whether the answer from your own point of view would be that it was indeed worth seeing your Mum suffer for those extra few weeks of life just to have had her with you for that extended period.
#91194
Abernathy wrote: Sat Jun 21, 2025 12:46 pm
davidjay wrote: Sat Jun 21, 2025 12:35 pm Thank you all. I'm now pondering whether the extra weeks of her anguish were worth having if they meant her going peacefully when her time really had come.
One of those thoughts that inevitably comes to mind in these, very particular, circumstances. Though I clearly cannot possibly know, I would venture that from your Mum’s point of view, the answer to that question is almost certainly no.

Only you can say whether the answer from your own point of view would be that it was indeed worth seeing your Mum suffer for those extra few weeks of life just to have had her with you for that extended period.
Sorry, I may not have made myself clear. What I meant to say was whether it was better for her to have a few more bad weeks then die peacefully rather than to have gone earlier in agony. I know that if I'd have preferred her to have died a couple of months ago but at least this way I can remember a more dignified end. It's a very difficult subject; everyone will approach it differently and I don't think any of us has the right to condemn anyone else's decision.
#91204
davidjay wrote: Sat Jun 21, 2025 12:47 am By one of the coincidences that make our world such an interesting place my mum finally slipped away a few hours after the vote. Anyone who voted against it should have had to spend the last few months visiting her. She was thankfully peaceful over the past few days but before that we had months of mental torture for her and a lot of angst for those of us who saw her fading.
Very sorry to hear this, chap. As others have said, I’m sure in time the recent trauma will fade and the memories of happier times will take their rightful place. But in the meantime you know she’s no longer suffering.
Malcolm Armsteen liked this
#91207
Good to see strong criticism BTL to this. Estimated time assisted dying would start is 2029, not next week. "Wider society" though. Is that basically "never"? She supports the principle though.

There's a chance for Starmer to raise some tax for palliative care. He ought to take it. Then again he ought to have raised a Putin Tax too, and he didn't.

#91208
davidjay wrote: Sat Jun 21, 2025 1:36 pm

Sorry, I may not have made myself clear. What I meant to say was whether it was better for her to have a few more bad weeks then die peacefully rather than to have gone earlier in agony. I know that if I'd have preferred her to have died a couple of months ago but at least this way I can remember a more dignified end. It's a very difficult subject; everyone will approach it differently and I don't think any of us has the right to condemn anyone else's decision.
You explained it very here. Can I ask, was it a surprise that your Mum became more comfortable? Were you told this might happen? Glad that it worked out like it did.
  • 1
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17

Sorry, I may not have made myself clear. What […]

Labour Government 2024 - ?

This, I think, was announced some time ago, but it[…]

Reform Party

Yeah, it can't be unsaid. Like Starmer saying[…]

Trump 2.0 Lunacy

"I'll say whatever you want me to sa[…]