User avatar
By kreuzberger
#98901
The Kreuzette was uncharacteristically relaxed about one of those 1950s-style coach fuckers coming at us last week, head-on around a blind bend.

We were on a scooter. He had "KILLER" emblazoned on the front.
User avatar
By Boiler
#98902
Bones McCoy wrote: Thu Oct 30, 2025 3:21 pm There are excellent reasons why the inva-car was dropped.
They weren't practical or safe.
Disabled people have equipment to move about and (take a deep breath) families who wish to travel with them.
On 31 March 2003, almost all of the remaining Invacars owned by the government were recalled and scrapped because of safety concerns. These included failing crash tests at Mira in 1974, a high accident rate and poor handling test results.
As built, the Type 70 Invacar had a sliding seat that could accommodate a wheelchair alongside the driver, and space behind the driver for equipment or just shopping. But they were just single-seaters which was an issue. Little crash resistance of course, but there are modern cars that fall into the "quadricycle" category that are just as bad - the infamous G-Wiz and the modern Citroën Ami.

The Type 70s could also do over 60mph... :o
By Bones McCoy
#98913
Boiler wrote: Thu Oct 30, 2025 4:42 pm
Bones McCoy wrote: Thu Oct 30, 2025 3:21 pm There are excellent reasons why the inva-car was dropped.
They weren't practical or safe.
Disabled people have equipment to move about and (take a deep breath) families who wish to travel with them.
On 31 March 2003, almost all of the remaining Invacars owned by the government were recalled and scrapped because of safety concerns. These included failing crash tests at Mira in 1974, a high accident rate and poor handling test results.
As built, the Type 70 Invacar had a sliding seat that could accommodate a wheelchair alongside the driver, and space behind the driver for equipment or just shopping. But they were just single-seaters which was an issue. Little crash resistance of course, but there are modern cars that fall into the "quadricycle" category that are just as bad - the infamous G-Wiz and the modern Citroën Ami.

The Type 70s could also do over 60mph... :o
Showing my age here.
I recall a TV programme (could have been Nationwide) did an investigation.
They got a rally driver to pilot one (with one of the new engines).
At 50mph the steering lurched about like a Reform supporter at a spelling test.
Just below 60 the front fork twisted dumping the whole thing over onto its side.

I think the backstory was the originals used an old motorcycle engine.
When the motorcycles were discontinued, Invacars were transitioned to a much more powerful engine.
This took the chassis well beyond its designed stress tolerances.

The builders weren't complete idiots, so stuck on some improvements.
But there's not a lot you can do to "upgrade" the delicate human inside.
Especially if they already face physical challenges.

Recall these were the days of leaded petrol, cigs that would "open your airways" and seatbelts were for pansies.
User avatar
By kreuzberger
#98919
Ah, seatbelts - which bring us firmly back on topic with Reflux.

"Why should we wear them when those fackin Sikhs don't have to wear crash helmets?"
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#98921
Your man for seatbelts, was Ivan Lawrence MP (Con, Burton).

https://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/ ... 22a.1786.1

Here he manages to take an arguable point about driving instructors, and ends up here.
The harm to justice caused by this legislation will be far more substantial than we think. When will we realise that every little infringement of liberty, for whatever good cause, diminishes the whole concept of liberty? If life is the only criterion, why did we sacrifice so many millions of lives in two world wars? Why did we not in the Second World War lie down and say"Because millions of people may die, we should let our liberty be taken away before the onset of the Nazis "? The answer is that more important than lives is the concept of liberty.
Me neither.

When Nick Hancock handed over Room 101 to Paul Merton, he appeared as Merton's first guest. One of Nick's choices was "people who can't argue properly". Paul gave the example of someone he'd seen on a TV debate about the monarchy accusing a republican of wanting to "bring back Hitler". Ivan Lawrence might have got a mention too.
  • 1
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
Labour Government 2024 - ?

So... an end terrace in Jaywick for him then?

Prince Andrew's not a Nonce

It is somewhat satisfying to see this sorry, sordi[…]

Kemi Badenoch

Still going. Reeves "didn't follow […]

Conservatives Generally

Why do Labour politicians turn up to this?