By Youngian
#99097
A lonely man with time on his hands to study spread betting on horse races will win more times than lose. If they do that too many times with accumalted winnings, the mental health nurses down at the bookies will be instructed to tell them to bugger off.
They will however give you a hug and say 'never mind, luv' for blowing your family's weekly budget.
User avatar
By Yug
#99098
There's a reason why every high street has 3 or 4 different bookies practically next door to each other. If gambling tax is increased those dens won't close. They make far too much money.
User avatar
By Samanfur
#99101
And a pawnbroker.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#99111
Anything less than putting every bookie out of business will incur a bucketful of shit from The Guardian etc who will claim that they've got off likely because she had some tickets paid for by gambling companies, and "lobbying", because business uniquely shouldn't get to put its case.

Sure, the free tickets don't give a great impression, but there ought to be far more interest in the actual policies. You'd ideally seek some sort of balance in terms of reducing harms, tax raising, and people being able to do what they want lawfully (the alternative isn't necessarily that they gamble less). But the political incentive seems to be pick a side.

Am I qualified to judge if an appropriate balance has been struck? Nowhere near. So I suppose I'm picking a side, Rachel's side, just like anyone else.
By satnav
#99117
The Sun has spent the last couple of weeks attacking any new taxes on betting. I'm sure that this has got nothing to do with the fact the paper is full of adverts for various betting companies.
  • 1
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
Telegraph

We're going to need a smaller nanoviolin.

I had the misfortune to hear Chris Felch on the To[…]

The Times

High Street bookies are taking a hammering from […]

Nonce Andrew's not a Prince

"Full Admiral" is: a) a wres[…]