By Oboogie
#99517
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Sun Nov 09, 2025 5:25 pm Zack's been doing history too. "The Irish" apparently. I didn't know "the Irish" were participants in the Troubles. Is this some sort of Alan Partridge effort? "Yes but they're the ones who make them"

The bit about South Africa is even worse. Does he think the ANC were the apartheid government?

Of course this is a variant of the mostly disreputable "People said Galileo was mad" gambit, beloved of quacks ever since.

https://bsky.app/profile/ciaranmcgurdy. ... 7fnszf4226
"Post not found"
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#99531
Zack's got another column in The Guardian. In which he gets to stand tall against the likes of Carole Malone and Piers Morgan. This is the nearest he gets to policy.
In the past weeks, I’ve had many interactions with journalists that have been positive, but it’s striking how often commonsense policies are treated as if they’re extreme. From our plans to bring water into public ownership, to supporting rent controls and an end to the “war on drugs” – I follow the evidence from the UK’s failures, and examples from across the world of how to do things better.
I can see why he'd want to reclaim common sense from the right, but it's the same sort of rubbish. Not a minute of work has been done on any of these things, someone's just told him they do something that sounds nice somewhere else, so we should do that. The wealth tax, where there's considerable evidence from across the world that these don't work, is justified simply because it's popular.

Does anyone really say denationalizing water is unthinkable anyway? I've not seen that. I've seen people question the cost. Shouldn't Zac do a serious budget on that sometime? There are some people who say it should cost very little, admittedly, but others who don't say that. He'll just quote the ones who agree with him. I suppose Zac's not going to do a serious budget because there's nothing in it for him. There's never anything in it for an opposition politician. See John Smith's Shadow Budget.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... e-politics
By Youngian
#99542
Don't know if Zach conflated this approach to the Portuguese model which most of his supporters have. Portugal doesn't have a regulated narcotics market but has decriminalised use. Don't think Carole Malone is typical in being stuck in 1975 on the drugs debate.
commentator Carole Malone telling the Daily Express that I was a “dangerous man” because I want a public health-based approach to drugs. That doesn’t mean making all drugs freely available over the counter. It means taking out organised crime and the gangs, tightly regulating the market and supporting people who become dependent on drugs with medical interventions, not jail.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#99546
He didn't mention Portugal, so I assume he's going a lot further. That's if he's got any actual policy in mind at all, of course. This isn't a bad policy for someone who's not expecting to lead a government, because nobody else will agree to it, and he can wheel it out every time he's asked how he'll fund something. "The War on Drugs costs us <insert any number you like>" He's not looking to win votes in Runcorn.
  • 1
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
The Greens

He didn't mention Portugal, so I assume he�[…]

The BBC

There's no clear candidate for DG. Does […]

Labour Government 2024 - ?

Talking of which. Quite encouraging to see Britain[…]

Trump 2.0 Lunacy

The Douchebag Dome has a nice ring to it. I&#[…]