Boiler wrote: ↑Thu Oct 30, 2025 4:42 pm
Bones McCoy wrote: ↑Thu Oct 30, 2025 3:21 pm
There are excellent reasons why the inva-car was dropped.
They weren't practical or safe.
Disabled people have equipment to move about and (take a deep breath) families who wish to travel with them.
On 31 March 2003, almost all of the remaining Invacars owned by the government were recalled and scrapped because of safety concerns. These included failing crash tests at Mira in 1974, a high accident rate and poor handling test results.
As built, the Type 70 Invacar had a sliding seat that could accommodate a wheelchair alongside the driver, and space behind the driver for equipment or just shopping. But they were just single-seaters which was an issue. Little crash resistance of course, but there are modern cars that fall into the "quadricycle" category that are just as bad - the infamous G-Wiz and the modern Citroën Ami.
The Type 70s could also do over 60mph...
Showing my age here.
I recall a TV programme (could have been Nationwide) did an investigation.
They got a rally driver to pilot one (with one of the new engines).
At 50mph the steering lurched about like a Reform supporter at a spelling test.
Just below 60 the front fork twisted dumping the whole thing over onto its side.
I think the backstory was the originals used an old motorcycle engine.
When the motorcycles were discontinued, Invacars were transitioned to a much more powerful engine.
This took the chassis well beyond its designed stress tolerances.
The builders weren't complete idiots, so stuck on some improvements.
But there's not a lot you can do to "upgrade" the delicate human inside.
Especially if they already face physical challenges.
Recall these were the days of leaded petrol, cigs that would "open your airways" and seatbelts were for pansies.