User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#100198
Cameron's Tories never received any dodgy donations either. He didn't for instance promise no top down reorganization of the NHS, take loads of private health donations, and do the biggest reorganization for 60 years.
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#100275
It's occured to me that if the scandals that had occured under Starmer occured under Cameron how many would have resulted in resignations?
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#100279
Rushanara Ali wouldn't have gone- I thought actually she had a defence that she tried to sell the house, but the market deteriorated, so she let it out again, at market rate having (apparently) let it out a long way below that for years. Labour ministers always get pushed much harder to resign. Mandelson of all people had a raw deal when he resigned the second time under Blair.
By mattomac
#100317
Doubt Rayner would to be honest.

Haigh probably wouldn’t have under Johnson to Sunak.
By davidjay
#100329
The Weeping Angel wrote: Tue Nov 18, 2025 8:43 am It's occured to me that if the scandals that had occured under Starmer occured under Cameron how many would have resulted in resignations?
Maybe all of them. From May onwards no chance. Johnson would probably have promoted them.
mattomac liked this
User avatar
By Boiler
#100557
The Weeping Angel wrote: Fri Nov 21, 2025 10:06 pm Whilst Starmer has undoubtedly made mistakes in his office it should be remembered he was right about Covid.
And do we all remember the squawking by Sunak about how Labour would have locked us down forever or something?
By Youngian
#100562
Sunak has some questions to answer with his eating out meal subsidy, didn't that spread infection? As if they'd be any other consequence.
  • 1
  • 161
  • 162
  • 163
  • 164
  • 165
The Daily Torygraph

Libelling the judiciary. They would be safer playi[…]

The Guardian

How far it has fallen The lead story on the websit[…]

Postcards from the edge; If you turn up to a dinn[…]

Keir Starmer

Sunak has some questions to answer with his eatin[…]