User avatar
By Abernathy
#106139
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Mon Feb 16, 2026 9:31 pm

But the fact remains our side was about to do something but then was told it would lose in court. So it's not very good.
So it was therefore good not to go ahead and do it then? Nah - it was a U-TURN !!!! (even if there was actual precedent of similar having been done entirely legally).

You can talk about lions avoiding traps all you like, but fuck me, we were damned if we did, and damned if we didn’t.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#106140
The finance position is what you'd expect from the UK, given its position in financial services.

The tech position is more arguable, but the background there is that the EU has a poor record on tech. Ask Mario Draghi.

I think US tech will ditch Trump tomorrow if they have to.
Last edited by Tubby Isaacs on Mon Feb 16, 2026 10:15 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#106141
Abernathy wrote: Mon Feb 16, 2026 9:41 pm
So it was therefore good not to go ahead and do it then? Nah - it was a U-TURN !!!! (even if there was actual precedent of similar having been done entirely legally).

You can talk about lions avoiding traps all you like, but fuck me, we were damned if we did, and damned if we didn’t.
I'm rather confused about why it was going to be found to be unlawful, but the fact is the government could have presumably got this advice earlier. It looks bad.

But I don't really care. The important policy goes ahead, on unitarisation. We've got that in Herefordshire, and nobody says "bring back Leominster District Council".
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#106145
The Weeping Angel wrote: Mon Feb 16, 2026 10:17 pm It would be interesting to see a comparison between how many U-turns this government has made versus previous governments.
I recall Cameron doing a lot of them. This article reckons the Coalition did 21 in its first 2 years, arguably more.

It could have usefully made some more too. The Lansley health act was later criticized by Jeremy Hunt, his successor. Osborne's economic policy ought to have been u-turned on too, but the media preferred to praise him for "sticking to the plan".

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... nt-resolve
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#106154
Democracy, like freedom, is one of those things it's good to weaponise. Once you've got it on your side, anyone against you is by default anti-democratic. Just keep bellowing it for the idiots.
Youngian liked this
By Youngian
#106155
Britain’s problems are home grown, self-inflicted by a sub-Marxist, class war-driven Labour Government with little grasp of economic reality.

Hang on, I thought Labour no longer represent the working class and should be listening to people who want to 'make everything here again' like we used to.
By Youngian
#106156
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Mon Feb 16, 2026 9:51 pm The finance position is what you'd expect from the UK, given its position in financial services.

The tech position is more arguable, but the background there is that the EU has a poor record on tech. Ask Mario Draghi.

I think US tech will ditch Trump tomorrow if they have to.

The past is a different country at the best of times and Draghi was speaking when a different paradigm existed in world affairs.
I may have been harsh on Starmer
UK bank bosses will hold their first meeting to establish a national alternative to Visa and Mastercard, amid growing fears over Donald Trump’s ability to turn off US-owned payment systems.
The City-funded, but government-backed, initiative has been under discussion for years. However, Trump’s recent threats against Nato allies over Greenland have amplified concerns that an over-reliance on US companies could put UK payments – and the wider economy – at risk.
https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... W3ZEHw-brA
Tubby Isaacs liked this
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#106160
The Weeping Angel wrote: Mon Feb 16, 2026 11:13 pm That many? I can only remember the one about forests.
Yeah, Cameron was notorious for it. You can see in that article that it was something he was put under pressure about.

But he got away with loads. Not increasing VAT was a classic, which was just accepted.
  • 1
  • 262
  • 263
  • 264
  • 265
  • 266
Labour Government 2024 - ?

That many? I can only remember the one about for[…]

Guardian

An article by Phil Mongredien. The hill I will d[…]

Reform Party

https://bsky.app/profile/alexofbrown.bsky.social[…]

Trump 2.0 Lunacy

In an intervention that is likely to be clocked b[…]