By Youngian
#111038
He returned to seek revenge on all those that broke Britain. Cut to scene of Nigel fencing with a mirror.
By Oboogie
#111047
Boiler wrote: Fri May 22, 2026 5:24 pm
Youngian wrote: Fri May 22, 2026 8:41 am Struggle to see that is Farage's market level even as the panto villain contestant. He's too boring even for that.
his £1.5m fee for participating in I’m a Celebrity … Get Me Out of Here! in late 2023.
The question you must ask yourself though is "how much ad revenue would he have generated for ITV?"

Incidentally, the Strines are sacking the show off, or "resting" it as they now call it.
Farage is good box office - with apologies to James O'Brien, that's not opinion, that's counting.
I once saw a graph of Question Time viewing figures for the 2010s, usually pretty flat but with huge spikes every time Farage was on.
It'll be the same for the other political shows. The assumption that Farage's appearance on TV proves the political bias of the broadcaster, programme or presenter overlooks the fact that TV success is measured in viewing figures.
It's grim that there's no progressive politician who attracts as much attention, but that's where we are.
Boiler liked this
By Youngian
#111055
It's grim that there's no progressive politician who attracts as much attention, but that's where we are.

In the Kinnock era, Labour leaned on the broadcast media to complain about the ubiquity of Derek Hatton, Livingstone and Scargill. As you say, they were box office not because BBC or ITV were run by Trots in the late 80s.
Oboogie liked this
By Oboogie
#111058
Youngian wrote: Sat May 23, 2026 5:52 pm
It's grim that there's no progressive politician who attracts as much attention, but that's where we are.

In the Kinnock era, Labour leaned on the broadcast media to complain about the ubiquity of Derek Hatton, Livingstone and Scargill. As you say, they were box office not because BBC or ITV were run by Trots in the late 80s.
Yep, people who are likely to say controversial stuff and ensure the debate gets "lively" makes better* TV than people debating points of policy in a moderate and sensible manner.

*"better" as in more popular.
By Youngian
#111090
Oh really and why would the Kremlin do that, was it their money to begin with? Farage seems reluctant to place some flesh on his outlandish theory.
Nigel Farage alleges that Russian state-linked hackers accessed his phone, email, and bank accounts to obtain details of a £5m gift from Thai-based crypto billionaire Christopher Harborne. He says only four people knew of the donation, which he claims was used for private security, and forensic analysis pointed to 'sophisticated' spear phishing by hostile state actors. The Guardian first reported the gift, and Defence Secretary John Healey has asked Farage to clarify whether any of the funds might be connected to Russian state-linked energy transactions. https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/insight/ ... snapshot-1
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#111091
Bear in mind that the front-page story in the Mail was penned by the same 'journalist' who gave us the story of the sabotage to Nargle's Volvo that turned out to be complete bullshit...
kreuzberger, Youngian liked this
User avatar
By kreuzberger
#111092
Nothing reeks more of a planted story than that. In fairness to the Graun, they are going six-guns on the story, too.

Who he had reported the alleged hack to?
Was any evidence was handed to British authorities?
How had the examination of his handset suggested that Russia was responsible?
It is understood the National Cyber Security Centre is not aware of a report from Farage related to the alleged hack.
There is also a whiff of rope-a-dope here; keep nibbling away until BBC News has to put a shoulder behind the story, much as I am sure they would rather not, and much as I am sure that that is just my wilful thinking...while he hoovers up his untold riches.
By Youngian
#111093
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: Sun May 24, 2026 10:49 pm Bear in mind that the front-page story in the Mail was penned by the same 'journalist' who gave us the story of the sabotage to Nargle's Volvo that turned out to be complete bullshit...
You'd have thought Nigel's £5m security operation would have prevented this dastardly Russian hack.
Watchman, mattomac liked this
User avatar
By Boiler
#111118
"A claim without any merit", according to a former head of the NCSC.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... re-5m-gift
Martin said: “An aspiring prime minister has essentially claimed that Russia has launched an unprecedentedly aggressive intervention – a malicious intervention – in British politics, and he’s not produced a shred of evidence to support that claim.

“He’s made a serious foreign policy and national security allegation which if true would have massive implications for British policy towards Russia.

“It is a very, very serious thing to allege. It would be a national security issue. If it is true, the government should be in emergency session in COBR right now considering their response to the most serious Russian intervention in internal British affairs for years.”
Oboogie liked this
User avatar
By kreuzberger
#111120
Yup, he appears to have completely overplayed that media-moisturised hand of his.

These issues are being highlighted as matters of national security and BBC News will be ill-advised to hold their line. It's time to dial down on this cunt.
User avatar
By Boiler
#111126
Couldn't agree more, Kreuzy.

I'm sick of the BBC's equivocation on the subject, I'm sick of (most of) the Dead Tree Media perpetually giving him a free pass and most of all, I'm sick of his mentally deficient supporters cheering the cunt on - although the real headbangers are now starting to desert him in favour of Lowe's mob.
Dalem Lake, Spoonman liked this
By Oboogie
#111136
Labour (and Reform's other opponents) should be going in hard on this, use the national security angle. If Reform are being targeted by a hostile foreign power ALL their ICT should be examined by the security services to see what else the Russians have been up to, seize all their devices and go through them with a fine toothcomb.
Farage is demanding protection because he claims he's been the target of assassination attempts, ok, take him (and other prominent Refuckers) into custody for their own protection.
Give the fucker what he says he wants!
Yug, Boiler liked this
By Oboogie
#111140
There is also the matter of Farage's dereliction of duty, he says he was aware of a breach of national security by a foreign power but failed to alert the security services. If the Russians can hack the leader of one party, who's to say they haven't hacked other MPs, other party leaders maybe including the PM, or the Defence Secretary etc. Farage needs to explain to the House, the police and the security services why he took no action.
Fuck it, hang the horrible cunt for treason!
Youngian, Yug, Boiler liked this
User avatar
By Watchman
#111144
Did they not do a security check after Nige's bloke in Wales was outed as a Russian asset?
User avatar
By Yug
#111145
After that little episode the frog-faced cunt tightened security by telling his fellow Russian assets to hide it better.
Watchman, mattomac, Oboogie and 1 others liked this
  • 1
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
General M*il C*nt'ry

I used to do that on the odd occasion when I was y[…]

The BBC

Boy, has the Beeb left the gates open for the cunt[…]

Robert Jenrick MP

Anyhow Honest Bob and Yusuf seem to be having a fi[…]

Nargle Fargle

After that little episode the frog-faced cunt tigh[…]